Skip to main content

Table 2 Hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals of all-cause mortality by quartiles of intake for fruit and vegetables (n = 150,969)

From: Fruit and vegetable consumption and all-cause mortality: evidence from a large Australian cohort study

 

Quartilesa

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

P for trend

HR

95 % CI

HR

95 % CI

HR

95 % CI

HR

95 % CI

 

Fruit and vegetable intakea

Model 1 (crude)

1.0

Reference

0.80

0.75,0.85

0.70

0.65,0.75

0.76

0.71,0.81

<0.0001

Model 2b (age, sex adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.89

0.83,0.95

0.79

0.73,0.85

0.77

0.72,0.83

<0.0001

Model 3c (adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.99

0.93,1.06

0.92

0.86,0.99

0.90

0.84,0.97

0.002

Fruit intakea

Model 1 (crude)

1.0

Reference

0.91

0.83,1.00

0.78

0.72,0.86

0.78

0.71,0.85

<0.001

Model 2b (age, sex adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.75

0.69,0.83

0.66

0.60,0.72

0.62

0.56,0.68

<0.001

Model 3c (adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.91

0.83,0.99

0.86

0.78,0.94

0.84

0.76,0.93

0.001

Vegetable intakea

Model 1 (crude)

1.0

Reference

0.78

0.72,0.84

0.71

0.66,0.75

0.79

0.74,0.85

<0.0001

Model 2b (age, sex adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.87

0.81,0.94

0.81

0.76,0.87

0.82

0.77,0.88

<0.0001

Model 3c (adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.95

0.88,1.02

0.92

0.86,0.99

0.93

0.87,1.00

0.017

Cooked vegetable intakea

Model 1 (crude)

1.0

Reference

0.74

0.68,0.80

0.87

0.81,0.94

0.88

0.81,0.95

0.004

Model 2b (age, sex adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.86

0.80,0.93

0.89

0.83,0.97

0.80

0.74,0.86

<0.0001

Model 3c (adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.92

0.85,1.00

0.98

0.90,1.06

0.87

0.80,0.95

0.003

Raw vegetable intakea

Model 1 (crude)

1.0

Reference

0.62

0.57,0.66

0.56

0.50,0.61

0.65

0.59,0.72

<0.0001

Model 2b (age, sex adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.76

0.70,0.82

0.76

0.69,0.84

0.77

0.70,0.85

0.0005

Model 3 (adjusted)

1.0

Reference

0.87

0.81,0.94

0.92

0.84,1.02

0.94

0.85,1.04

0.793

  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, Q quartile
  2. aThe quartiles of intake for fruit and vegetables (servings/day) were as follows: Fruit and vegetables combined: Q1: <4.0; Q2: 4 to ≤ 5.0; Q3: 5.0 to ≤7.0; Q4: >7.0. Fruit: Q1: <1.0; Q2: 1.0 to <2.0; Q3: 2.0 to <2.3; Q4: ≥2.3. Vegetables: Q1: ≤2.0; Q2: 2.0 to ≤3.0; Q3: 3.0 to ≤5.0, Q4: >5.0. Cooked vegetables: Q1: ≤1.0; Q2: 1.0 to ≤2.0; Q3: 2.0 to ≤3.0, Q4: >3.0. Raw vegetables: Q1: <1.0; Q2: 1.0 to <1.3; Q3: 1.3 to ≤ 2.0; Q4: >2.0
  3. bModel 2 was adjusted for age (continuous) and sex
  4. cModel 3 was adjusted for age (categorical), sex, education level, marital status, location of residence, socio-economic status, smoking status, physical activity categories, multi-vitamin use, processed meat consumption, diabetes and body mass index categories. Any significant (P < 0.05) interactions (shown in Table 3) with age group, sex, education level, body mass index categories and smoking status, were included in this model. The model for fruit was adjusted for vegetable intake and vice versa