Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between perceived safety from crime and walking inside the neighbourhood (min/week)

From: Safe RESIDential Environments? A longitudinal analysis of the influence of crime-related safety on walking

Variable

Model 1 Demographics

Model 2 Built environment

Model 3 Social cohesion

Model 4 Perceptions

 

Estimate (SE)

p

Estimate (SE)

p

Estimate (SE)

p

Estimate (SE)

p

Total walking

18.04 (3.50)

0.0001

18.77 (3.50)

0.0001

13.53 (3.61)

0.0002

10.54 (3.97)

0.0079

Walking for recreation

13.51 (2.36)

0.0001

13.70 (2.37)

0.0001

10.25 (2.46)

0.0001

7.01 (2.70)

0.0096

Walking for transport

3.18 (1.27)

0.0127

3.56 (1.27)

0.0051

1.38 (1.31)

0.2922

0.68 (1.44)

0.6378

  1. Proc Mixed marginal model with unrestricted variance pattern
  2. Model 1 adjusts for age, gender, income, education, marital status, importance of safety from crime to neighbourhood selection and time
  3. Model 2: Model 1 + residential density, street connectivity and local destinations
  4. Model 3: Model 2 + perceptions of neighbourhood social cohesion
  5. Model 4: Model 3 + perceptions of aesthetics, traffic and street lighting
  6. Bold denotes significant p-value