Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality rating scores for all papers included in the systematic review.NA=Not applicable

From: Do physical activity interventions in Indigenous people in Australia and New Zealand improve activity levels and health outcomes? A systematic review

Author

Selection bias

Study design

Confounders

Blinding

Data collection method

Withdrawals and dropouts

Overall rating

Biddle et al. [48]

Weak

Strong

Weak

NA

Strong

Strong

Weak

Canuto et al. [49]

Moderate

Strong

Strong

NA

Strong

Weak

Moderate

Chan et al. [43]

Weak

Moderate

NA

NA

Strong

Moderate

Moderate

Coppell et al. [50]

Weak

Moderate

NA

Weak

Strong

Weak

Weak

Davey et al. [40]

Weak

Moderate

NA

NA

Strong

Moderate

Moderate

Dimer et al. [51]

Moderate

Moderate

NA

NA

Strong

Weak

Moderate

Egger et al. [42]

Weak

Strong

NA

NA

Strong

Strong

Moderate

Gracey et al. [52]

Strong

Moderate

NA

NA

Strong

Weak

Moderate

McAuley et al. [36]

Weak

Moderate

NA

NA

Strong

Strong

Moderate

Mendham et al. [41]

Moderate

Strong

Strong

Moderate

Strong

Weak

Moderate

O’Dea [39]

Weak

Moderate

NA

NA

Strong

Strong

Moderate

Rowley et al. [35]

Weak

Moderate

Strong

Weak

Strong

Weak

Weak

Sukala et al. [53]

Moderate

Moderate

Strong

Moderate

Strong

Moderate

Strong

Overall score

1 strong, 3 moderate, 9 weak

4 strong, 9 moderate, 0 weak

4 strong, 0 moderate, 1 weak, 8 NA

0 strong, 2 moderate, 2 weak, 9 NA

13 strong, 0 moderate, 0 weak

4 strong, 3 moderate, 6 weak

1 strong, 9 moderate, 3 weak