Skip to main content

Table 4 Multinomial logistic regression analysis showing the association between meal planning and adherence to nutritional guideline score (mPNNS-GS) and food variety score (N = 40,554 - NutriNet-Santé 2014)a

From: Meal planning is associated with food variety, diet quality and body weight status in a large sample of French adults

 

Univariable

Multivariable

 

OR [95% CI]

P

OR [95% CI]

P b

Adherence to nutritional guidelines (mPNNS-GS score)

 Q1 (<6.91)

1

 

1

 

 Q2 ([6.91–7.83])

1.10 [1.04;1.17]

0.0006

1.06 [1.00;1.13]

0.039

 Q3 ([7.83–8.8])

1.16 [1.10;1.23]

<0.0001

1.10 [1.03;1.16]

0.0022

 Q4 (≥8.8)

1.23 [1.16;1.30]

<0.0001

1.13 [1.07;1.20]

<0.0001

Food variety score

Overall

 Q1 (<127)

1

 

1

 

 Q2 ([127–146])

1.15 [1.09;1.22]

<0.0001

1.15 [1.08;1.22]

<0.0001

 Q3 ([146–162])

1.28 [1.21;1.36]

<0.0001

1.16 [1.10;1.23]

<0.0001

 Q4 (≥162)

1.34 [1.27;1.42]

<0.0001

1.25 [1.18;1.32]

<0.0001

Vegetables

 Q1 (<20)

1

 

1

 

 Q2 ([20–23])

1.22 [1.15;1.29]

<0.0001

1.18 [1.11;1.25]

<0.0001

 Q3 ([23–25])

1.33 [1.26;1.41]

<0.0001

1.24 [1.17;1.32]

<0.0001

 Q4 (≥25)

1.38 [1.3;1.46]

<0.0001

1.21 [1.14;1.28]

<0.0001

Fruits

 Q1 (<15)

1

 

1

 

 Q2 ([15–17])

1.13 [1.06;1.20]

<0.0001

1.07 [1.01;1.13]

0.032

 Q3 ([17–19])

1.21 [1.14;1.28]

<0.0001

1.12 [1.06;1.19]

0.0002

 Q4 (≥19)

1.23 [1.17;1.31]

<0.0001

1.12 [1.06;1.19]

<0.0001

  1. Boldface indicates statistical significance
  2. aThe modeled probability was the fact to plan meals
  3. bAdjusted for sex, age, educational level, monthly income per household, presence of children in the household, history of dieting to lose weight during the past year, physical activity cooking frequency, and daily energy intake