Skip to main content

Table 3 Results from logistic regression models predicting regular usage of height-adjustable desks

From: Who uses height-adjustable desks? - Sociodemographic, health-related, and psycho-social variables of regular users

 

Unadj. OR [95% CI]

Adj. OR [95% CI]

Gender

0.46 [0.21; 1.01]

0.39 [0.14; 1.12]

Age

0.97 [0.94; 1.01]

0.97 [0.93; 1.02]

Education

0.98 [0.63; 1.51]

0.86 [0.49; 1.53]

Body Mass Index

1.03 [0.93: 1.14]

1.09 [0.93; 1.28]

Working Hours per week

1.03 [1.00; 1.06]

1.00 [0.96; 1.05]

Subjective health status

0.78 [0.51; 1.19]

0.89 [0.50; 1.60]

Health Knowledge ‘Sitting for most of the time at work is bad for my health’

1.35 [1.00; 1.81]*

1.03 [0.69; 1.54]

Perceived organisational social norms ‘At my workplace nobody would mind if I chose to stand up while working at my desk’

1.23 [0.84; 1.81]

0.87 [0.51; 0.1.50]

Perceived behavioural control ‘It is my choice whether I stand up or sit at my desk while at work’

1.25 [0.82; 1.91]

1.40 [0.80; 2.45]

Advantages of sitting less ‘For me to sit less at work is pleasant’

1.69 [1.17; 2.45]**

1.75 [1.09; 2.81]*

Disadvantages of sitting less ‘For me to sit less at work is not beneficial at all’

0.75 [0.55; 1.01]

0.68 [0.45; 1.05]

Habit ‘I sit down at my desk without thinking about it’

0.93 [0.71; 1.22]

0.98 [0.67; 1.43]

  

R2 = 0.21 (Cox & Snell), 0.28 (Nagelkerke). Model Chi-Square 24.04

  1. * = p < 0.05
  2. ** = p < 0.01