Skip to main content

Table 4 Fit indices (FI) for each specified model for bullies, victims and bully-victims

From: Does psychological functioning mediate the relationship between bullying involvement and weight loss preoccupation in adolescents? A two-stage cross-sectional study

Role

FI

MODEL

Model 1a

Model 2b

Model 3c

Bully

CFI

.813

.716

.944

TLI

.625

.562

.895

RMSEA

.168

.117

.057

Victim

CFI

.924

.866

.963

TLI

.848

.793

.930

RMSEA

.148

.101

.058

Bully-Victim

CFI

.882

.800

.981

TLI

.763

.691

.964

RMSEA

.166

.114

.039

  1. aModel 1 was the unadjusted model i.e., Fig. 3
  2. bModel 2 was adjusted for sex, BMI, pubertal stage, age, parental education and ethnicity; i.e., direct paths between each variable and weight loss preoccupation were included
  3. cThe Lagrange Multiplier test was used to estimate which parameters should be included to improve model fits. Additional parameters included in model 3 were indirect paths between sex, pubertal stage and BMI percentile on weight loss preoccupation via psychological functioning and error covariance between body-esteem and weight loss preoccupation