Skip to main content

Table 6 Pairwise comparisons of exercise-specific motivations, regulations, and reflective processes, between combined, aerobic-only, and strength-only guidelines

From: Correlates of meeting the combined and independent aerobic and strength exercise guidelines in hematologic cancer survivors

Variable

Combined vs Aerobic

Combined vs Strength

Aerobic vs Strength

Motivational processes

 Attitude

  Aerobic

p = .07, d = 0.35

p  < .001, d = 0.90

p  < .001, d  = 0.63 a

  Strength

p  < .001, d = 0.98

p = .05, d = 0.41

p  = .004, d  = 0.50 b

 Injunctive norm

  Aerobic

p = .15, d = 0.24

p  = .002, d = 0.57

p  = .05, d  = 0.32 a

  Strength

p  < .001, d = 0.53

p = .07, d = 0.35

p  = .31, d  = 0.16 b

 Descriptive norm

  Aerobic

p = .25, d = 0.16

p  = .042, d = 0.32

p  = .26, d  = 0.18 a

  Strength

p  = .05, d = 0. 24

p = .89, d = 0.02

p  = .17, d  = 0.21 b

 Perceived control

  Aerobic

p = .010, d = 0.50

p  < .001, d = 0.92

p  = .012, d  = 0.44 a

  Strength

p  < .001, d = 0.56

p = .042, d = 0.49

p  = .48, d  = 0.13 b

Behavioral regulations

 Planning

  Aerobic

p < .001, d = 1.02

p  = .005, d = 0.49

p  < .001, d  = 0.52 b

  Strength

p  < .001, d = 1.06

p = .003, d = 0.50

p  < .001, d  = 0.54 b

Reflective processes

 Obligation/Regret

  Aerobic

p = .013, d = 0.42

p  < .001, d = 1.30

p  < .001, d  = 0.93 a

  Strength

p  < .001, d = 1.10

p = .011, d = 0.45

p  < .001, d  = 0.62 b

 Regulation of alternatives

  Aerobic

p = .012, d = 0.33

p  < .001, d = 0.75

p  = .016, d  = 0.40 a

  Strength

p  < .001, d = 0.86

p = .18, d = 0.23

p  < .001, d  = 0.70 b

  1. Note. a= comparisons favoring the aerobic-only guideline group, b= comparisons favoring the strength-only group. Hypothesized comparisons are bolded