Skip to main content

Table 2 Study 1: Separate models examining estimated odds ratios for self-reported physical activity outcomes adjusting for student characteristics

From: Examining the impact of a province-wide physical education policy on secondary students’ physical activity as a natural experiment

Survey Data

Model 1–30 min/day

Model 2–60 min/day

Model 3 – KKD

    

Active vs Inactive

Moderately Active vs Inactive

Fixed effect (95% CI)

P value

Fixed effect (95% CI)

P value

Fixed effect (95% CI)

P value

Fixed effect (95% CI)

P value

Study Condition

 Comparison (PEI)

Referent

<.0001

Referent

<.0001

Referent

0.23

Referent

0.32

 Intervention (Manitoba)

2.24 (1.88, 2.66)

 

1.32 (1.16, 1.50)

 

1.16 (0.91,1.48)

 

1.13 (0.89, 1.45)

 

Time

 Baseline

Referent

 

Referent

 

Referent

 

Referent

 

 Follow-up

0.79 (0.65, 0.95)

0.01

0.95 (0.82, 1.10)

0.49

1.13 (0.84, 1.51)

0.41

1.15 (0.86, 1.52)

0.35

Condition*Time Interaction

1.13 (0.92, 1.39)

0.24

0.92 (0.78, 1.07)

0.26

0.63 (0.47, 0.85)

0.0021

0.82 (0.61, 1.11)

0.20

Grade

 9

Referent

 

Referent

 

Referent

 

Referent

 

 10

0.91 (0.82, 1.00)

0.05

0.91 (0.86, 0.97)

0.0016

0.84 (0.75, 0.93)

0.0008

0.92 (0.82, 1.02)

0.12

 11

0.75 (0.68, 0.82)

<.0001

0.73 (0.69, 0.77)

<.0001

0.58 (0.52, 0.64)

<.0001

0.81 (0.73, 0.90)

<.0001

 12

0.66 (0.60, 0.73)

<.0001

0.68 (0.64, 0.72)

<.0001

0.52 (0.47, 0.57)

<.0001

0.80 (0.72, 0.89)

<.0001

Sex

 Female

Referent

<.0001

Referent

< .0001

Referent

< .0001

Referent

<.0001

 Male

1.87 (1.74, 2.00)

1.88 (1.80, 1.95)

 

2.26 (2.10, 2.43)

 

1.29 (1.20, 1.39)

 

BMI status

 Healthy weight

Referent

0.0007

Referent

0.0006

Referent

< .0001

Referent

0.20

 Overweight or obese

0.88 (0.81, 0.95)

 

0.92 (0.88, 0.97)

 

0.85 (0.78, 0.92)

 

0.95 (0.87, 1.03)

 
  1. Note: Fixed effects of intercepts for each model are not shown. 95% confidence intervals are shown in parentheses. Referent categories are identified as “Referent”