Skip to main content

Table 5 Quality assessment of included studies

From: Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Paper

Selection bias

Study design

Confounders

Blinding

Data collection methods

Withdrawals & dropouts

Overall

Goh et al., 2016

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

moderate

weak

MODERATE

Beck et al., 2016

moderate

strong

strong

moderate

weak

strong

MODERATE

De Greeff et al., 2016

moderate

strong

strong

moderate

strong

moderate

STRONG

Altenburg et al., 2016

weak

strong

strong

moderate

strong

weak

WEAK

Mead et al., 2016

weak

strong

weak

moderate

weak

weak

WEAK

Mullender Wijnsma et al., 2016

moderate

strong

weak

weak

strong

strong

WEAK

Van den berg et al., 2016

weak

strong

strong

moderate

moderate

weak

WEAK

Grieco et al., 2016

moderate

strong

weak

strong

moderate

weak

WEAK

Carlson et al., 2015

moderate

weak

weak

weak

strong

strong

WEAK

Ma et al., 2015

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

strong

weak

MODERATE

Ma et al., 2014

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

moderate

strong

STRONG

Howie et al., 2014

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

strong

weak

MODERATE

Howie et al., 2015

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

strong

weak

MODERATE

Janssen et al., 2014

weak

moderate

strong

moderate

strong

weak

MODERATE

Wilson et al., 2015

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

weak

weak

WEAK

Hill et al., 2011

moderate

moderate

strong

strong

weak

strong

MODERATE

Hill et al., 2010

moderate

moderate

strong

strong

weak

weak

WEAK

Ahamed et al., 2007

moderate

strong

strong

moderate

weak

weak

WEAK

Whitt-Glover et al., 2011

moderate

strong

weak

moderate

weak

strong

WEAK

Uhrich & Swarm., 2007

moderate

strong

weak

moderate

strong

weak

WEAK

Katz et al., 2010

moderate

strong

weak

moderate

weak

weak

WEAK

Lisahunter et al., 2014

weak

strong

weak

moderate

strong

weak

WEAK

Bernard et al., 2014

moderate

strong

weak

moderate

strong

strong

MODERATE

Fedewa et al., 2015

weak

strong

weak

moderate

strong

strong

WEAK

Erwin et al., 2013

moderate

strong

weak

moderate

strong

strong

MODERATE

Grieco et al., 2009

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

moderate

weak

MODERATE

Mahar et al., 2006

moderate

strong

weak

moderate

moderate

weak

WEAK

Bailey & DiPerna., 2015

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

weak

weak

WEAK

Vazou et al., 2012

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

strong

weak

MODERATE

McCrady-Spitzer et al., 2015

weak

moderate

strong

moderate

strong

strong

MODERATE

Norris et al., 2015

moderate

strong

strong

moderate

weak

weak

WEAK

Mullender Wijnsma et al., 2015a

moderate

moderate

strong

moderate

moderate

weak

MODERATE

Mullender Wijnsma et al., 2015b

moderate

strong

weak

moderate

moderate

weak

WEAK

Graham et al., 2014

weak

strong and moderate

weak

moderate

weak

weak

WEAK

Riley et al., 2014

moderate

strong

weak

weak

weak

strong

WEAK

Riley et al., 2015

moderate

strong

strong

weak

weak

strong

WEAK

Donnelly et al., 2009

moderate

strong

strong

moderate

strong

strong

STRONG

Reed et al., 2010

weak

strong

weak

moderate

strong

weak

WEAK

Schmidt et al., 2016

moderate

strong

strong

moderate

strong

weak

MODERATE

  1. Overall rating
  2. Strong = no weak ratings
  3. Moderate = 1 weak rating
  4. Weak = 2 or more weak ratings