Table 4 Logistic regression models exploring factors predicting analysis of differential effects
From: Equity effects of children’s physical activity interventions: a systematic scoping review
OR (95% confidence interval) of reporting differential effects by any equity characteristic (n = 113) | OR (95% confidence interval) of reporting differential effects by gender (n = 98) | |
|---|---|---|
Australasia vs all others | 0.4 (0.1–2.1) | 0.2 (0.0–1.8) |
European vs all others | 1.1 (0.2–5.8) | 0.8 (0.1–5.1) |
North American vs all others | 0.4 (0.1–2.1) | 0.2 (0.0–1.3) |
PA only (1) or multi-behaviour intervention (0) | 0.7 (0.3–1.5) | 1.1 (0.5–2.4) |
Home-based vs all others | 0.6 (0.3–1.4) | 0.6 (0.3–1.3) |
School-based vs all others | 2.9 (1.2–7.2) | 4.5 (1.5–13.2) |
Community based vs all others | 0.9 (0.4–2.0) | 0.8 (0.3–2.0) |
Health-care based vs all others | Not enough variation to run | Not enough variation to run |
Age (Child under 12 (0), Adolescent 13–18 (1)) | 1.4 (0.6–3.2) | 1.6 (0.6–4.2) |
Sample Size (Per increase in 100 participants) | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) |
Journal impact factor | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.1 (0.9–1.2) |
Reported a main intervention effect on any outcome | 2.5 (0.6–9.8) | Not enough variation to run |
Reported a main intervention effect on objectively measured physical activity | 3.0 (1.3–6.8) | 3.6 (1.3–9.5) |