Skip to main content

Table 1 RE-AIM measures and data sources used to obtain information

From: Evaluation of a community-based, family focused healthy weights initiative using the RE-AIM framework

Assessment level

Measures

Data sources

Timeline

Reach

• Eligibility criteria

• Interview data (Director)

• Pre Survey items (Coordinator)

Pre-intervention

• # Children/families in area, served by community center that meet that criteria

• Statistics Canada

• Interview data (Director)

• Survey data (Coordinator)

Pre-intervention

• # Children/families registered for the program

• Summary Forms (Coordinator)

Post-intervention

• # Exclusions

• Survey data (Coordinator)

Post-intervention

• Recruitment strategies

• Interview data (Director)

• Survey data (Coordinator)

Pre-intervention

• Identification of facilitators and barriers to recruitment

• Interview data (Director)

• Survey data (Coordinator)

Pre-intervention

Effectiveness

• Short-term attrition rates

• Survey (Caregivers, Children)

Baseline, post-intervention

• Healthy eating and physical activity efficacy beliefs

• Knowledge related to healthy eating, physical activity and screen time guidelines.

• Perceived social support for physical activity and healthy eating

• Healthy eating, physical activity and screen time behavour

• Children’s health related quality of life

• Survey (Caregivers, Children)

Baseline, post-intervention

• Perception of impact/consequences (positive or negative)

• Interview data (Facilitators and Directors)

Post-intervention

Adoption

Setting Level

• Criteria for implementing HT

• Documentation (The Bridge)

Post-intervention

• # of settings approached to implement

• # of settings that expressed interest in implementing HT

• Num. of sites expressing interest that were excluded

• Difference in settings between 1) those that expressed interest vs. no-interest. 2) exclusion vs. inclusion

Staff Level

• Exclusion criteria

• # staff approached/applied to be part of HT

• Degree to which staff participating in HT are representative of staff at the centre

• Survey data (Directors)

Pre-intervention

• Barriers to staff participation

• Survey data (Facilitators, Directors, Coordinators)

Pre-intervention

Implementation

• Degree to which project objectives were met

• Observations

During-Intervention

• Degree to which program activities were administered

• # and type of adaptations made

• After-session survey (Facilitators)

During-intervention

• Program attendance rate

• Observations

During-intervention

• Barriers and facilitators to implementation

• Interview (Facilitators)

Post-intervention

• Time cost of the intervention

• After-session surveys (Facilitators)

During-intervention

• Financial costs of the intervention

• Documentation (The Bridge)

Post-Intervention

Maintenance

Individual Level

• Long term study attrition

• Survey (Caregivers, Children)

Pre, 6-month follow-up

• Healthy eating and physical activity efficacy beliefs

• Knowledge related to healthy eating, physical activity and screen time guidelines.

• Perceived social support for physical activity and healthy eating

• Healthy eating, physical activity and screen time behaviour

• Children’s health related quality of life

• Survey (Caregivers, Children)

Pre, 6-month follow-up

Setting Level

• # of sites running Healthy Together

• Surveys (Directors, Coordinators)

1-year follow-up survey and email

• Adaptations of the program – retained elements

• Reasons for lack of implementation