Skip to main content

Table 1 Participants’ characteristics by total sample and according to the frequency of cooking at home

From: Spatial access to restaurants and grocery stores in relation to frequency of home cooking

Characteristics

Total sample

Frequency of cooking at home

(days per week) n = 4607

 

0 – 3

4 – 5

6 – 7

 
 

n

 

13.1%

21.2%

65.7%

 

Age - mean (SD)

5027

52.3 (16.3)

47.9 (15.6)

49.7 (15.8)

53.6 (16.3)

< 0.001a

Sex (%)

5025

    

< 0.001b

 Male

 

44.5

15.5

22.0

62.6

 

 Female

 

55.5

11.2

20.7

68.2

 

Educational attainment (%)

4591

    

0.850 b

 Lower

 

46.2

12.4

21.3

65.8

 

 Higher

 

53.8

13.4

21.2

65.3

 

Household composition (%)

4593

    

< 0.001 b

 1 adult, no child

 

22.1

20.7

25.8

53.6

 

 2 adults, no child

 

47.9

9.75

18.9

71.3

 

 Adult(s), child(ren)

 

30.1

13.0

21.7

65.4

 

Employed or in education (%)

5057

    

< 0.001 b

 No

 

42.2

9.59

17.8

72.7

 

 Yes

 

57.8

15.6

23.6

60.8

 

BMI - mean (SD)

4503

25.2 (4.5)

25.6 (4.8)

25.3 (4.6)

25.1 (4.4)

0.006 a

Number of perceived barriers to healthy eating - median (IQR)

4135

2 (0 - 4)

3 (2 - 5)

3 (1 - 4)

2 (0 - 3)

< 0.001b

Urban regions (%)

5076

    

< 0.001 b

 Ghent and suburbs (Belgium)

 

33.3

6.47

16.7

76.8

 

 Paris and suburbs (France)

 

13.9

16.4

20.4

63.2

 

 Budapest and suburbs (Hungary)

 

14.0

38.7

33.5

27.9

 

 The Randstad (the Netherlands)

 

28.5

6.04

19.5

74.5

 

 Greater London (UK)

 

10.3

12.9

23.9

63.2

 

Tertiles for spatial access to restaurants

5076

    

< 0.001 b

 T1 (lowest access)

 

33.3

8.00

18.3

73.7

 

 T2

 

33.4

12.6

20.7

66.7

 

 T3 (highest access)

 

33.3

18.6

24.6

56.8

 

Tertiles for spatial access to grocery stores

5076

    

< 0.001 b

 T1 (lowest access)

 

33.3

9.01

18.6

72.4

 

 T2

 

33.3

13.3

22.3

64.4

 

 T3 (highest access)

 

33.3

17.0

22.7

60.4

 
  1. a ANOVA; b Chi-square; IQR Interquartile range