Themes | Sub Themes | Comments |
---|---|---|
Information Provided | Clear information (5 of 6 Sites) | “Labels were clear and easy to understand.” |
Concise information (2 of 6 Sites) | “Really good, clear and quality labelling.” | |
Missing information (3 of 6 Sites) | “We used to list fat, salt and sugar… I think sometimes people just get a bit confused by it all” | |
“People started to ask about salt, started to ask about sugar…” | ||
Implementation Issues | Issues in getting calorie information (4 of 6 Sites) | “What had always stopped us in the past was the chefs and their freedom to be chefs” |
Time-consuming to implement (6 of 6 sites) | “The blocker for us is getting the calories of the meals that they make on site and being accurate with that” | |
Easy to run (6 of 6 sites) | “ There is a lot of sending data which is very time consuming” | |
“Once you just get on with it and when you start to understand, actually its fine” | ||
Feedback from Customers | Addition of information (5 of 6 sites) | “Because we were adding information for people and not taking anything away from them, I think that was a positive thing” |
Awareness of labels (6 of 6 sites) | “…it was noticed and people were pleased to see it. They were surprised actually and it was driving them to make difficult choices.” | |
“Nobody really commented on it either way… it certainly wasn’t an issue.” |