Skip to main content

Table 4 Effects of a Sedentary Behavior Intervention on Quality of Life in Men With Prostate Cancer on Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July 2015–October 2016 (N = 46)

From: RiseTx: testing the feasibility of a web application for reducing sedentary behavior among prostate cancer survivors receiving androgen deprivation therapy

  Baseline (T0) Post-intervention (T1) 12-week Follow-Up (T2) aAdjusted Difference in Mean Change (T0-T1) aAdjusted Difference in Mean Change (T0-T2)
Outcome Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean [95% CI] p Mean [95% CI] p
Physical Well-Being (0–28) 23.5 (0.6) 23.3 (0.6) 22.7 (0.8) −0.3 [−1.2 to 0.8] .59 −0.8 [−2.3 to 0.6] .27
Social Well-Being (0–28) 19.7 (0.8) 19.7 (0.7) 19.2 (0.8) −0.0 [−1.6 to 1.6] .99 −0.6 [−2.6 to 1.5] .57
Emotional Well-Being (0–24) 17.9 (0.8) 19.0 (0.7) 19.0 (0.7) + 1.2 [0.2 to 2.1] .018 + 1.1 [−0.2 to 2.4] .091
Functional Well-Being (0–28) 20.9 (0.7) 20.0 (0.8) 19.8 (0.8) −0.8 [−2.0 to 0.3] .15 −1.1 [−2.7 to 0.5] .17
FACT-General (0–108) 82.0 (2.0) 82.0 (2.1) 80.5 (2.2) + 0.0 [−2.6 to 2.6] .99 −1.6 [−5.3 to 2.2] .41
FACT-Fatigue (0–160) 122.1 (2.9) 121.4 (3.4) 118.7 (3.5) −0.6 [−4.4 to 2.9] .68 −3.4 [−8.7 to 1.9] .20
FACT-Prostate (0–156) 114.9 (2.7) 113.4 (3.0) 112.7 (3.2) −1.5 [−4.7 to 1.6] .33 −2.2 [−6.9 to 2.4] .34
TOI-Fatigue (0–108) 84.5 (2.1) 82.6 (2.6) 80.7 (2.8) −1.9 [−4.9 to 1.1] .21 −3.8 [−8.2 to −0.6] .086
  1. Minimal important differences (MID) points for PWB (2–3); EWB (2–3); SWB (2–3); FWB (2–3); FACT-G (3–7); FACT-F (7); TOI-F (5); FACT-P (6–10)
  2. FACT Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-G Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, FACT-F Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue, TOI-F Trial Outcome Index-Fatigue, FKSI-15 Kidney symptom index, SPA + EC Supervised physical activity plus exercise counseling, SPA + BC Supervised physical activity plus behavioral counseling
  3. aDifference in mean change adjusted for baseline value