From: Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis
Criterion | Data extracted |
---|---|
Country research conducted | Country |
Study design | Between-subjects, within-subject, laboratory, field. |
Participant characteristics | Total sample size; number of male and female participants; mean, median, standard deviation and range for age and BMI and BMI assessment method if assessed (self-report or objectively measured). |
Moderating variables | Individual differences in eating behaviour traits [dieting status; restrained eating (scale used) or any other psychometric scales]; any other moderators examined. |
Cue type and level of engagement | Type of cue: Specific item (e.g. slim models, foods); level of engagement: explicit, incidental, sub-conscious; cue validation |
Test food | Interval between cue exposure and assessment of food intake; Test foods used: snack, meal, sweet, savoury, food name. |
Mechanism for effects tested? | Yes, no; type of assessment used. |
Main outcome | Food intake in ounces, piece count, grams and energy intake; assessment method for food intake (weighed, piece count) |
Risk of bias | Random allocation to conditions, randomisation methods, allocation concealment, blinding (use of a cover story and participants' beliefs about the study aims; whether the researcher was aware of the study aims or condition that had been administered), completion of outcome reporting (excluded participants), procedures used to control for appetite, individual or social setting, administration of psychometric scales. |