Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of effect sizes from previous reviews and the current review

From: The effects of yoga compared to active and inactive controls on physical function and health related quality of life in older adults- systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Outcome

Study

Effect size in comparator review

Effect size present review

Notes

Balance

Youkhana et al. (2016)

Hedges’ g = 0.40, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.65. I2 = 0.00%, p = 0.615

Inactive controls: Hedges’ g = 0.70, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.22. I2 = 72.15, p = 0.001

Larger effect size in current review may be attributed to inclusion of a RCT [76] which recruited participants with poor balance at baseline.

Mobility

Youkhana et al. (2016)

Hedges’ g = 0.50, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.95. I2 = 51.8%, p = 0.126

Inactive controls: No meta-analysis for mobility

Mobility assessed by timed-up-and-go test in the current review (measured by only 2 studies). Mobility measured in Youkhana et al. (2016) by three studies using the timed-eight-foot-walk, sit-to-stand test and the 4-m-walk.

Perceived mental health

Tulloch et al. (2018)

Hedges’ g = 0.38, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.62. I2 = 56.3%, p = 0.009

Inactive controls: Hedges’ g = 0.6, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.87. I2 = 54.87, p = 0.02

Larger effect size in current review may be attributed to differences in inclusion criteria, differing search strategies, and search dates.

Patel et al. (2012)

SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.22. I2 = 77%

Comparable effect size.

Perceived physical health

Tulloch et al. (2018)

Hedges’ g = 0.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.76. I2 = 62.9%, p = 0.002

Inactive controls: Hedges’ g = 0.61, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.94. I2 = 58.55, p = 0.05

Larger effect size in current study may be attributed to differences in inclusion criteria, differing search strategies, and search dates.

Patel et al. (2012)

SMD = 0.65, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.28. I2 = 82%

Comparable effect size.

Depression

Patel et al. (2012)

SMD = − 0.57, 95% CI - 1.17 to 0.04. I2 = 80%

(The negative effect size here indicates that yoga reduces depression scores to a greater extent than comparison groups)

Inactive controls: Hedges’ g = .64, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.95. I2 = 57.09, p = 0.02

Inclusion of more RCTs may have increased the power to detect differences between groups, producing significant effects favouring the yoga group in the current study.

  1. SMD: Standardised Mean Difference, CI: Confidence Interval, RCT: Randomised Controlled Trial