Skip to main content

Table 2 Odds ratios for considering it easy or very easy to understand different food labelling systems*

From: Understanding and use of food labeling systems among Whites and Latinos in the United States and among Mexicans: Results from the International Food Policy Study, 2017

 

Total sample (N = 35,618)

White (n = 14,692)

Latino (n = 3316)

Mexican (n = 17,610)

%

OR [95% CI]

%

OR [95% CI]

%

OR [95% CI]

%

OR [95% CI]

Labelling Scheme (Ref. NFT)

 Warning Labels

85

4.82 [4.39–5.30] ***

87

2.90 [2.49–3.38]***

82

4.07 [2.92–5.68]***

84

7.95 [6.89–9.16]***

 Guideline Daily Amounts

63

1.02 [0.95–1.09]

73

0.94 [0.83–1.07

64

1.04 [0.80–1.37]

55

1.08 [0.98–1.19]

 Health Stars Rating

45

0.34 [0.31–0.37]***

34

0.09 [0.08–0.11]***

48

0.35 [0.25–0.47]***

52

0.92 [0.81–1.04]

 Multiple Traffic Light

54

0.56 [0.52–0.61]***

47

0.19 [0.17–0.22]***

56

0.52 [0.39–0.69]***

59

1.31 [1.17–1.45]***

Ethnicity (Ref. Latino)

 White

63

0.89 [0.75–1.05]

 Mexican

61

0.96 [0.82–1.13]

Sex (Ref. Man)

        

 Woman

63

1.10 [1.01–1.20]*

65

1.27 [1.11–1.46]***

65

1.34 [0.93–1.93]

61

0.97 [0.86–1.11]

Age (years)

 

1.00 [1.00–1.00]

 

1.00 [1.00–1.01]

 

1.00 [0.98–1.01]

 

1.00 [0.99–1.00]

Survey language (Ref. English)

 Spanish

56

1.02 [0.75–1.38]

67

1.18 [0.83–1.66]

Education (Ref. High-school or lower)

 Technical studies

64

1.08 [0.93–1.25]

65

0.97 [0.78–1.22]

68

1.71 [1.01–2.90]*

61

1.07 [0.85–1.36]

 Bachelor’s degree or higher

62

0.91 [0.81–1.02]

63

0.85 [0.71–1.03]

63

1.08 [0.71–1.64]

61

0.93 [0.78–1.11]

Income adequacy (Ref. Difficult)

 Neither easy nor difficult

60

1.04 [0.94–1.16]

60

0.82 [0.68–1.00]*

60

0.89 [0.60–1.34]

61

1.15 [1.00–1.31]*

 Easy

66

1.40 [1.25–1.56]***

65

1.18 [0.98–1.41]

65

1.32 [0.87–2.00]

67

1.53 [1.28–1.82]***

Occupation (Ref. Unemployed)

 Part time worker or student

62

0.92 [0.82–1.03]

63

0.88 [0.75–1.04]

56

0.74 [0.47–1.14]

62

0.97 [0.80–1.18]

 Worker or student

62

0.96 [0.87–1.07]

64

0.93 [0.77–1.11]

66

0.52 [0.34–0.79]***

61

1.08 [0.94–1.25]

BMI (Ref. Normal weight)

 Overweight

62

0.92 [0.83–1.01]

64

1.00 [0.86–1.16]

59

0.74 [0.50–1.10]

60

0.92 [0.80–1.06]

 Obesity

61

0.94 [0.84–1.05]

64

1.05 [0.89–1.24]

64

1.11 [0.72–1.71]

58

0.83 [0.70–0.98]*

Nutrition Knowledge (Ref. Not knowledgeable)

 Somewhat Knowledgeable

62

1.41 [1.28–1.56]***

62

1.23[1.05–1.43]**

62

1.70 [1.15–2.51]**

62

1.51 [1.31–1.75]***

 Knowledgeable

69

1.97 [1.75–2.22]***

73

1.76 [1.48–2.08]***

68

3.19 [1.99–5.14]***

73

2.04 [1.66–2.51]***

Calorie count (Ref. Never)

 Sometimes

66

1.28 [1.17–1.41]***

67

1.30 [1.13–1.50]***

59

0.75 [0.52–1.09]

67

1.40 [1.21–1.62]***

 Most of the time

69

1.51 [1.25–1.81]***

69

1.64 [1.28–2.10]***

73

1.14 [0.60–2.18]

68

1.49 [1.06–2.10]*

Food shopping (Ref. Yes)

 No

59

0.90 [0.78–1.04]

64

1.03 [0.83–1.29]

62

0.84 [0.44–1.58]

54

0.82 [0.66–1.01]

 Share

62

1.03 [0.93–1.14]

64

1.15 [0.99–1.34]

63

0.99 [0.65–1.50]

60

0.97 [0.84–1.13]

  1. OR = Odds Ratio; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Intervals
  2. Mixed models were adjusted for sex, age, survey language, education, income adequacy, occupation, BMI, nutrition knowledge, calorie count, and food shopping in household
  3. Significance levels: P value * < 0.05, ** < 0.01,*** < 0.001
  4. *Data were weighted using survey weights