Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants across three conditionsa,b

From: Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial

Variable

NFC (n = 51)

VFC (n = 44)

VFC+ (n = 46)

Age, y (SD)

50.6 (11.0)

49.6 (11.0)

47.40 (14.4)

Female, n (% of questionnaire respondents)

21 (58% of 36)

26 (59% of 44)

22 (65% of 34)

BMI, kg/m2 (SD)

31.7 (5.2)

31.2 (4.4)

31.6 (3.9)

Perceived eating ratec (SD)

7.7 (1.3)

7.6 (1.1)

7.7 (1.3)

Has eating discomfortd (%)

3%

2%

0%

Has stomach complaintsd (%)

18 (47%)

26 (55%)

20 (53%)

Has diabetes type Id (%), IId (%)

3 (9%), 2 (6%)

2 (5%), 9 (21%)

5 (14%), 0 (0%)

Is on a dietd (% of Q1 respondents)

10 (29%) of 36

15 (34%) of 44

15 (43%) of 34

  1. a – NFC, no feedback condition; VFC, vibrotactile feedback condition, VFC+, vibrotactile + visual feedback condition
  2. b – All data are for those participants allocated to the intervention (NFC n = 51; VFC, n = 44, VFC+, n = 46) AND filled out the premeasurement questionnaire (NFC n = 36; VFC, n = 44, VFC+, n = 34)
  3. c – On a scale from 1 to 10
  4. d – Dichotomous scale: Yes / No