Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of participants with information on all covariates and outcomes, by experimental condition

From: The effects of small-scale physical and social environmental interventions on walking behaviour among Dutch older adults living in deprived neighbourhoods: results from the quasi-experimental NEW.ROADS study

 

1) Physical condition (n = 129)

2) Social condition (n = 97)

3) Combined physical and social condition (n = 148)

4) Control condition (no intervention) (n = 81)

Differences

Age (years), mean (SD)

64.9 (8.2)

64.0 (12.8)

68.6 (9.2)

64.4 (14.1)

combined vs physical: *

combined vs social **

combined vs control *

Gender

 Female

44.2%

47.4%

47.4%

43.2%

 

 Male

55.8%

52.6%

52.6%

56.8%

 

Region of birth

    

** 1

 The Netherlands

69.8%

69.1%

93.9%

59.3%

 

 Western

3.9%

6.2%

1.4%

0.0%

 

 Non-Western

26.4%

24.7%

4.7%

40.7%

 

Employment status

 Not employed

65.9%

69.1%

79.1%

72.8%

 

 Part time employed

11.6%

11.3%

9.5%

7.4%

 

 Fulltime employed

22.5%

19.6%

11.5%

19.8%

 

Relationship

    

* 1

 Not in a relationship

37.0%

43.3%

43.30%

37.0%

 

 In a relationship

63.0%

56.7%

56.7%

63.0%

 

Educational levels

    

** 1

 No

9.3%

6.2%

0%

11.1%

 

 Low

51.9%

29.9%

41.2%

49.4%

 

 Middle

31.8%

35.1%

46.6%

30.9%

 

 High

7.0%

28.9%

12.2%

8.6%

 

Total walking at baseline, mean minutes per week (SD)

481.7 (520.7)

425.3 (482.0)

334.6 (306.1)

514.1 (513.1)

combined vs physical *

combined vs control *

Recreational walking at baseline, mean minutes per week (SD)

179.7 (267.2)

147.8 (233.5)

177.4 (216.4)

179.3 (249.9)

 

Utilitarian walking at baseline, mean minutes per week (SD)

302.1 (332.2)

277.5 (306.5)

157.2 (184.1)

334.8 (355.4)

combined vs physical: **

combined vs social **

combined vs control **

  1. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, statistically significant chi-square tests show that there is a difference between groups, no post-hoc tests were performed