Implementation outcomes | Delivery of the intervention | Delivery of implementation strategies |
Definitions | Definitions | |
1. Adoption | Proportion and representativeness of providers or the delivery team* that deliver an intervention [25]. | Proportion and representativeness of the support system* that utilize implementation strategies. |
2. Dose delivered (dose) | Intended units of each intervention component delivered to participants by the delivery team [38]. | Intended units of each implementation strategy delivered by the support system. |
3. Reach | Proportion of the intended priority audience (i.e., participants) who participate in the intervention [39]. | Proportion of the intended priority populations (organizations and/or participants) that participate in the intervention. |
4. Fidelity (adherence) | The extent to which an intervention is implemented as it was prescribed in the intervention protocol - by the delivery team [5]. | The extent to which implementation strategies are implemented as prescribed in the scale-up plan - by the support system. |
5. Sustainability (maintenance) | Whether an intervention continues to be delivered and/or individual behaviour change is maintained; intervention and individual behaviour change may evolve or adapt with continued benefits for individuals after a defined period of time [40]. | Whether implementation strategies continue to be delivered and/or behaviour change at the system level are maintained; implementation strategies and behaviour change at the system level may evolve or adapt with continued benefits for systems after a defined period of time. |
Implementation determinants | Delivery of the intervention | Delivery of the implementation strategy |
1. Context | Aspects of the larger social, political, and economic environment that may influence intervention implementation [41]. | Aspects of the larger social, political, and economic environment that may influence delivery of the implementation strategies |
2. Acceptability | Perceptions among the delivery team that a given intervention is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory [16]. | Perceptions among the support system that implementation strategies are agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. |
3. Adaptability | Extent to which an intervention can be adapted, tailored, refined, or reinvented to meet local needs [27]. | Extent to which implementation strategies can be adapted, tailored, refined, or reinvented to meet the needs of organizations at scale-up. |
4. Feasibility | Perceptions among the delivery team that an intervention can be successfully used or carried out within a given organization or setting [16]. | Perceptions among the support system that implementation strategies can be successfully used or carried out at scale within different organizations or settings. |
5. Compatibility (appropriateness) | Extent to which an intervention fits with the mission, priorities, and values of organizations or settings [17]. | Extent to which implementation strategies fit with the mission, priorities, and values of organizations at scale-up. |
6. Cost | Money spent on design, adaptation and implementation of an intervention [42]. | Money spent on design, adaptation and delivery of implementation strategies. |
7. Culture | Organizations’ norms, values, and basic assumptions around selected health outcomes [27]. | Organizations’ norms, values, and basic assumptions around selected implementation strategies. |
8. Dose (satisfaction) | Delivery team’s satisfaction with an intervention and with interactions with the support system [38]. | Support system’s satisfaction with implementation strategies. |
9. Complexity | Perceptions among the delivery team that a given intervention is relatively difficult to understand and use; number of different intervention components [27, 37]. | Perceptions among the support system that implementation strategies are relatively difficult to understand and use; number of different strategies. Related to implementation setting. |
10. Self-efficacy | Delivery team’s belief in its ability to execute courses of action to achieve implementation goals [43]. | Support system’s belief in its ability to execute courses of action to achieve implementation goals. |