Skip to main content

Table 1 Definition of data sets and analysis

From: Like me, like you – relative importance of peers and siblings on children’s fast food consumption and screen time but not sports club participation depends on age

ModelNaTarget childrenNbCommentAnalysisTable/Figure
15388Randomly assigned child per family2694All childrenCSTable 3
1a2795Boys, randomly assigned1387Stratified by the sex of the target childCSTable 3
1b2593Girls, randomly assigned1307CSTable 3
1c2726Randomly assigned child with a SS sibling1363Stratified by the sex of the siblingCSTable 3
1d2662Randomly assigned child with an OS sibling1331CSTable 3
1e2572Randomly assigned child with a near-aged sibling1286Stratified by the age difference with the sibling (≤ 2.7 vs >  2.7 years)CSTable 3
1f2816Randomly assigned child with a much younger or older sibling1408CSTable 3
1 g1920Randomly assigned child, <  7 years959Stratified by age groups of the target children (<  7, 7–8, 9–10 and ≥ 11 years)CSFigure 1
1 h1201Randomly assigned child, 7–8 years585CSFigure 1
1i1095Randomly assigned child, 9–10 years570CSFigure 1
1j1172Randomly assigned child, ≥11 years580CSFigure 1
21050Randomly assigned child per family525All childrenLTable 4
2a548Boys, randomly assigned272Stratified by the sex of the target childLTable 4
2b502Girls, randomly assigned253LTable 4
2c530Randomly assigned child with a same-sex sibling265Stratified by the sex of the siblingLTable 4
2d520Randomly assigned child with an opposite-sex sibling260LTable 4
2e380Randomly assigned child with a near-aged sibling190Stratified by the age difference with the sibling (≤ 2.7 vs >  2.7 years)LTable 4
2f670Randomly assigned child with a much younger or older sibling335LTable 4
  1. aNumber of observations on children from 2-child families
  2. bNumber of target children (= number of observations)
  3. CS cross-sectional, L longitudinal