Skip to main content

Table 2 Mediation analyses results

From: Neighbourhood fast food exposure and consumption: the mediating role of neighbourhood social norms

 

Paths

a

b

Direct effect

c’

Total effect

c

Indirect effect

c-c’

Mediator

B (95% CI)

P

OR (95% CI)

P

OR (95% CI)

P

OR (95% CI)

P

B (95% CI)

Descriptive norm

0.05 (0.03, 0.07)

< .001

1.16 (1.01, 1.33)

.03

1.02 (0.98, 1.06)

.36

1.02 (0.99, 1.07)

.22

0.006 (0.0003, 0.013)

Injunctive norm

0.03 (0.02, 0.04)

< .001

1.44 (1.22, 1.70)

< .001

1.02 (0.98, 1.06)

.46

1.02 (0.99, 1.07)

.22

0.01 (0.004, 0.017)

  1. Note: See Fig. 2 for an overview of the pathways in the mediation model. All analyses were adjusted for age and area-level income. Associations for pathways b, c’, and c are presented on the odds scale (i.e., as odds-ratios), while the indirect effect (c-c’) is presented on the log-odds scale
Back to article page

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

ISSN: 1479-5868

Contact us