Social ecological factors associated with physical activity and screen time amongst mothers from disadvantaged neighbourhoods over three years

Table 4 Linear regression analysis of the social ecological factors associated with mother’s leisure time physical activity

	Model 1^a		Model 2^b
	β	(95%CI)	β	(95%CI)
Intrapersonal
PA enjoyment	0.20	0.11,0.28***	0.19	0.09,0.28***
Outcome expectations	0.33	0.16,0.50***	0.28	0.10,0.46*
Self-efficacy	0.41	0.27,0.55***	0.43	0.29,0.57***
Behaviour Intentions	0.76	0.37,1.16***	0.69	0.27,1.11*
Behaviour skill	0.74	0.43,1.04***	0.72	0.39,1.06***
Social
Childcare	1.00	0.02,1.98*	0.44	−0.49,1.36
Social support: family/spouse	0.23	−0.03,0.49	0.27	− 0.01,0.53
Social support: friends/work colleagues	0.54	0.28,0.80***	0.56	0.29,0.84***
Environment
Cohesion	0.35	0.13,0.57*	0.34	0.09,0.58*
Safety	0.06	−0.15,0.28	0.04	− 0.17,0.24
Aesthetics	0.25	0.01,0.49*	0.22	−0.02,0.46
Walkability	0.18	−0.53,0.31*	0.14	−0.00,0.28
No. of TVs^c	−0.29	−0.80,0.22	− 0.69	−1.23,-0.16*

Notes: * p = <.05, ** p = ≤.001, *** p = .0001; β coefficient, 95% CI Confident intervals
^aadjusted for baseline variable and clustering by neighbourhoods
^badjusted for age, education, number of children, BMI, baseline variable and clustering by neighbourhoods; PA Physical activity, ^cNumber of television sets per household

ISSN: 1479-5868