Author, year | Review eligibility criteria | Search strategy | No. of included primary studies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Research design | Population | Intervention strategy | No. of data-bases | Synthesis method | Grey lit search | Search period | ||
Afshin et al., 2015 [43] | RCT and non-RCT; prospective cohort | Age: all ages Setting: all settings | Primary studies of policy strategies with prior evidence of effectiveness to improve diet (policies including mass media campaigns, food and menu labelling, taxation and subsidies, local built environment, school procurement policies, worksite wellness programs, and marketing standards). | 1 | Narrative synthesis | No | NR | 14 |
Afshin et al., 2017 [44] | RCT and non-RCT; prospective observational | Age: all ages Setting: all settings | Primary studies of multicomponent interventions that reported the effect of the price change separately or if the price change was a major component of the intervention. The primary outcome was the change in consumption of foods and beverages; data on sales/purchase were considered a proxy for consumption. | 7 | Pooled quantitative synthesis | No | June 2014 | 26 |
Carter et al., 2018 [45] | RCT and non-RCT | Age: all ages Setting: any out-of-home environment (e.g. grocery stores, supermarkets, restaurants, bars, school canteens, and workplace cafeterias) | Primary studies of intervention strategies which involved the comparison of the effect of an information-based cue at point of choice on food, alcohol or tobacco selection or consumption to that of a non-information-based cue condition. | 5 | Narrative synthesis | No | 26th Nov 2016 | 13 |
Champion et al., 2019 [46] | RCT | Age: students 11–18 years Setting: schools | Primary studies were eligible if they assessed a school-based prevention programme that was universal (i.e. delivered to all students regardless of their level of risk) and that targeted two or more of the following behaviours: alcohol use, smoking, diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviour (screen time and sitting), or sleep and were primarily delivered via eHealth methods (e.g. the internet, computers, tablets, mobile technology, or tele-health). | 4 | Pooled quantitative synthesis | No | 1 Jan 2000–14 March 2019 | 16 |
Cornelson et al., 2015 [47] | RCT and non-RCT; cross-sectional; cohort | Age: all ages Setting: all settings | Full-text primary studies employing nationally representative data that have estimated food cross-price elasticities. | 5 | Pooled quantitative synthesis | Yes | 28 Nov 2012 | 78 |
DeCosta et al. 2017 [22] | RCT and non-RCT | Age: 1–12 years Setting: all settings | Intervention/experimental studies measuring one or more of the following outcomes: food choice, preference, liking, intake, willingness to taste, and neophobia. Studies testing multifaceted approaches were generally not included in the review. | 3 | Narrative synthesis | No | Jan 2017 | 120 |
Feltner et al., 2016 [48] | RCT, non-RCT and prospective cohort studies | Age: workers, age not specified Setting: workplaces in developed countries | Primary studies of any “integrated intervention” that meets the definition of a Total Worker Health strategy (“a strategic and operational coordination of policies, programs, and practices designed to simultaneously prevent work-related injuries and illnesses, and enhance overall workforce health and well-being.”). Interventions may include a range of components that focus on changes in policy; organisational structure; work organisation; environmental factors; or individual worker education, counselling, training, or social support. | 4 | Narrative synthesis | Yes | 21 Sept 2015 | 15 |
Girard et al., 2012 [49] | RCT and non-RCT | Age: children 0–59 months and/or women of reproductive age, regardless of pregnancy status Setting: households in LMIC | Agricultural intervention strategies in LMIC aimed at increasing the quantity and/or quality of household food production (i.e. gardening strategies) | 5 | Narrative synthesis | No | 1990 – NR | 36 |
Hendren et al., 2017 [50] | RCT and non-RCT; prospective; observational; cross-sectional | Age: employees > 18 years Setting: worksite food services | Primary studies were included if the intervention was located at workplace dining locations (e.g. cafeteria, hospital cafeteria for employees, university employee dining, and Army canteens). Employees must be adults working in public, private, government, or voluntary organisations. | 4 | Narrative synthesis | No | 9 Aug 2016 | 18 |
Hendrie et al., 2017 [51] | RCT and non-RCT | Age: 2–12 years Setting: home and community | Primary studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the effectiveness of a community-based (excluding. school) intervention strategy aimed at improving vegetable consumption, either alone or in combination with other healthy eating and lifestyle messages; and had a quantitative measure of ‘usual’ vegetable consumption separate to other food groups (such as fruit). | 3 | Narrative synthesis | No | 2004 - June 2014 | 22 |
Hodder et al., 2020 [23] | RCT | Age: ≤ 5 years Setting: all settings | Trials of intervention strategies primarily targeting consumption of fruit, vegetables or both among children, and incorporating a dietary or biochemical assessment of fruit or vegetable consumption. | 3 | Pooled quantitative synthesis | No | Jan 2020 | 80 |
Hollis-Hansen et al., 2019 [52] | RCT, non-RCT and observational | Age: all ages Setting: Markets in lower-income communities | Primary studies that examined the introduction of new food retail into a lower-income community in the United States (including any Community Supported Agriculture, farmers’ market, farm stand, mobile produce market (MPM), healthy corner store, or grocery store); included F&V intake as an outcome; and determined “diet quality” as consumption of F&Vs. | 3 | Narrative synthesis | No | 24 Aug 2018 | 15 |
Hsiao et al., 2018 [53] | RCT, non-RCT and observational | Age: all ages Setting: All settings within the United States | Primary studies based on empirical research of MPMs located in the United States; had results; analysed MPM separately from other market venues; and analysed MPMs that predominantly sold fruits and/or vegetables. | 4 | Narrative synthesis | No | Dec 2017 | 24 |
Langford et al., 2014 [54] | Cluster-RCT | Age: 4–18 years Setting: schools | Primary studies where randomisation took place at the level of school, district or other geographical area. HPS interventions defined as comprising the following three elements: input to the curriculum; changes to the school’s ethos or environment or both; and engagement with families or communities, or both. | 20 | Pooled quantitative synthesis | Yes | 22 Apr 2013 | 67 |
Micha et al., 2018 [55] | RCT and non-RCT | Age: 2–18 years Setting: schools | Intervention trials that assessed the impact of school food environment policies in preschool, primary, or secondary schools on the outcomes of interest among generally healthy children. | 11 | Pooled quantitative synthesis | Yes | Dec 2017 | 91 |
Patnode et al., 2017 [56] | RCT and non- RCT | Age: adults, 18 years or order Setting: primary care | Primary studies that evaluated the effectiveness of behavioural intervention strategies targeting improved diet, increased physical activity, decreased sedentary time, or a combination of these targets among adults without known hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, impaired fasting glucose or glucose tolerance, or a combination of these factors. | 4 | Narrative synthesis | No | 25 May 2016 | 88 |
Rochira et al., 2020 [57] | RCT, non-RCT and observational studies | Age: 6–13 years Setting: Schools | Primary studies with the primary intervention strategy comprised of in-school gardening projects for primary school students (age range between 6 and 13 years). We excluded studies about preschool-aged children and adolescents. We included any outcome concerning anthropometric measurements, F&V consumption or knowledge and other outcomes such as blood pressure, science achievement, physical activity, and blood samples about metabolic syndrome markers. | 3 | Narrative synthesis | Yes | Feb 2019 | 33 |
Rodriguez et al., 2019 [26] | RCT, cluster RCT | Age: all ages Setting: all settings | Primary studies using eHealth intervention strategies aiming to improve fruit and vegetable intake in at least one arm of the study. Studies assessing F&V intake and reporting results quantitatively; providing pre- and post-intervention means with standard deviations, or data to compute them, and sample size per each group; using true or quasi-experimental design. | 6 | Pooled quantitative synthesis | No | 1999 to Jul 2018 | 19 |
Silveria et al., 2011 [58] | RCT | Age: 5–18 years Setting: Schools | Primary studies of nutritional education intervention strategies carried out in the school environment to reduce or prevent overweight in children and adolescents. | 14 | Narrative synthesis | No | 5 May 2010 | 24 |