Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression analysis predicting child BMI z-score at Time 3 from Time 1 variables (n = 119)

From: Maternal feeding style and child weight status among Hispanic families with low-income levels: a longitudinal study of the direction of effects

 

Block 1

Block 2

Block 3

Block 4

Model Adjusted R2

F (Model)

0.681

F(5,113) = 51.29***

0.673

F(8,110) = 31.30***

0.681

F(11,107) = 23.95***

0.704

F(14,104) = 21.09***

F (R2 Change)

 

F(3,110) = 0.080

F(3,107) = 2.024

F(3,104) = 3.766*

Independent Variables (Time 1)

Std Beta

Std Beta

Std Beta

Std Beta

Child gender (ref group: male)

0.076

0.072

0.089

0.073

Child age in months

0.060

0.060

0.050

0.055

Child BMI z-score

0.818***

0.820***

0.813***

0.799***

Acculturation (English domain)

0.067

0.068

0.087

0.059

Born in U.S.

−0.027

−0.028

−0.020

−0.028

Food Responsiveness

 

−0.036

−0.051

−0.084

Emotional Overeating

 

0.021

0.025

0.073

Satiety Responsiveness

 

−0.007

−0.008

0.025

Monitoring

  

−0.126

−0.149**

Pressure to Eat

  

0.045

0.076

Restriction

  

0.000

0.071

Authoritariana

   

−0.071

Authoritativea

   

0.098

Indulgenta

   

0.145

  1. p < .10; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001; Std Beta = Standardized beta coefficient; aFor each feeding style variable, a dichotomous predictor was used with a “2” assigned to mothers who showed that feeding style and a “1” to those who did not