Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of study and sample characteristics

From: A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss

No.

First author/published year/Country

Primary Aim(s)

Study design/# of groups

Theoretical framework

Sample characteristics

Total Size (N)/Attrition (%)

Mean age (SD) years and/or range

Females/ Women %

Race/ Ethnicity %

Education/Income

Randomized controlled trials

1

Kramer J/a 2020/Switzerland [31]

To evaluate the effects of the Ally chatbot that combines financial incentives, weekly planning, and daily self-monitoring prompts on reaching daily step goals.

Optimization randomized trial/1 group micro-randomized to incentive (cash vs. charity vs. no incentive) X Planning (action vs. coping vs. no planning) X Self-monitoring prompt (prompt vs. no prompt) groups.

Health Action Process Approach

N = 274/30.3%

41.7 (13.5)/NR

57.7

NR

59.9% with university degree

2

Kunzler F/b2019/Switzerland [33]

To explore the factors affecting users’ receptivity towards Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) delivered via the Ally chatbot.

Randomized controlled trial/ 3 groups (cash bonus vs. charity donation vs. control)

NR

N = 189/NR

40.0 (13.7)/NR

63.0

NR

NR

3

Piao M/ 2020/ South Korea [32]

To assess the efficacy of the Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot intervention presented via a messenger app aimed at stair-climbing habit formation for office workers.

Randomized Controlled Trial/ 2 groups (intervention vs. control)

Habit Formation Model

N = 106/12.3%

NR/20-59

56.7

NR

NR

4

Carfora V/2019/Italy [34]

To test a chatbot that delivers daily messaging intervention aimed at promoting the reduction of red and processed meat consumption (RPMC).

Randomized Controlled Trial/3 groups (informational vs. emotional vs. control)

NR

N = 180/8.0%

20 (2.0)/NR

75.6

NR

100% Undergraduate students

Non-randomized studies

5

Maher CA/2020/Australia [20]

To test the feasibility (recruitment and retention) and preliminary efficacy of physical activity and Mediterranean-style dietary intervention (MedLiPal) delivered via an artificially intelligent virtual health coach.

Quasi-experiment/1 group

NR

N = 31/9.7%

56.2 (8.0)/45-75

67.7

NR

NR

6

Fadhil A/2019/NR [35]

To present the design and validation of CoachAI, a conversational agent-assisted health coaching system on physical activity, healthy diet, and stress coping.

Quasi-experiment/1 group

Health Action Process Approach, Technology Acceptance Model, AttrakDiff Model

N = 19/NR

28.5 (9.4)/19-53

42.1

NR

Most were university students or had graduate degree

7

Stephens TN/2019/U.S. [21]

To assess the feasibility of integrating the Tess chatbot in behavioral counseling of adolescent patients coping with weight management and prediabetes symptoms to promote treatment adherence, behavior change, and overall wellness.

Quasi-experiment/1 group

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Emotionally Focused Therapy, Behavioral Activation, Motivational Interviewing

N = 23/NR

15.2 (NR)/9.78-18.54

57.0

Hispanic (43%), White (39%), Black (9%), Asian (9%)

NR

8

Casas J/ 2018/ Switzerland [36]

To evaluate the effects of a conversational assistant designed to monitor and coach participants to achieve specific goals regarding their diet.

Quasi-experiment/1 group

NR

N = 36/NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

9

Kocielnik R/ 2018/ U.S. [37]

To develop and examine the feasibility of a mobile conversational system, Reflection Companion, to engage users in reflection on physical activity through dialogues

Quasi-experiment/1 group

Structured Reflection Model

N = 33/NR

36.5 (11.2)/21-60

87.9

NR

55% college degree or being enrolled in college, 27% graduate degree

  1. Studies a and b employed the same chatbot named Ally
  2. NR not reported