Table 6 Acceptability of mHealth Interventions
Study | MHealth intervention | Point and method of measurement of satisfaction | Proportion of respondents | General perceived satisfaction rate | Messages/ content was understandable | Willingness to continue using the mHealth intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haddad et al [52] | Text messaging | End of intervention: Questionnaire survey | 100% | 100% | 90.5% | 100% |
Huo et al. [53] | Text Messaging | Last follow-up visit acceptability and utility survey | 239 (96.8%) | NR | 97.1% | 93.7% |
Li et al. [57] | Mobile app Wearable Activity Trackers | End of intervention: 5-point Likert scale Acceptability questionnaire, | 100% | Intervention: 45.2% Control: 40.4% | Â | Â |
Limaye et al. [58] | Text Messaging, email, Website, Facebook® | End of intervention: Text messages and Facebook® or website | NR | NR | NR | 98.0% |
Owolabi et al. [61] | Text Messaging | Post-intervention: Questionnaire Survey | 98 (90.7%) a | 98% | NR | 95.9% |
Patnaik et al. [62] | Mobile app | Post-intervention : Mobile Questionnaire Survey |  | Diet satisfaction c: 3.21 ± 1.02 Treatment satisfactiond : 13.09 ± 1.01 |  |  |
Pfammater et al. [65] | Text Messaging | End of intervention: Telephone survey | Intervention: 611 (62.2%) Control: 632 (67.0%) | NR | NR | NR |
Sun et al. [70] | Mobile app | End of intervention Likert scale | 100% | 90% (6.3/7) b | NR | NR |
Zhou et al. [73] | Mobile app | Pre- and post-intervention App-based question | NR | 84% | NR | NR |