RE-AIM framework | RE-AIM component | Proportion Reportinga, % |
---|---|---|
Reach | Method to identify target population | 100% |
Inclusion criteria | 100% | |
Exclusion criteria | 73.3% | |
Participation rate | 26.7% | |
Representativeness | 80% | |
Average Reach Dimension | 76% | |
Effectiveness | Measures/results for at least one follow-up | 100% |
Intent to treat analysis method | 60% | |
Quality-of-life or potential negative outcomes | 20% | |
Percent attrition | 46.7% | |
Average Effectiveness Dimension | 56.7% | |
Adoption | Description of intervention location | 46.7% |
Description of staff who delivered intervention | 46.7% | |
Method to identify staff who delivered intervention (target delivery agent) | 26.7% | |
Level of expertise of delivery agent | 13.3% | |
Inclusion/exclusion criteria of delivery agent or setting | 6.7% | |
Adoption rate of delivery agent or setting | 0% | |
Average Adoption Dimension | 23.3% | |
Implementation | Intervention duration and frequency | 100% |
Extent protocol delivered as intended (%) | 13.3% | |
Measures of cost of implementation | 0% | |
Average Implementation Dimension | 37.8% | |
Maintenance | Assessed outcomes ≥6 months post intervention | 13.3% |
Indicators of program level maintenance | 13.3% | |
Measures of cost of maintenance | 0% | |
Average Maintenance Dimension | 8.9% | |
Total | Â | 40.5% |