Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of results of the model-based economic evaluations investigating physical activity mass media campaigns

From: Economic evaluation of physical activity mass media campaigns across the globe: a systematic review

Author (year), Campaign

Perspective/ Time horizon

Population

Campaign

US$a/QALY or DALY

Cost-effective considering local thresholdb

Plane

Level of certaintyc

Roux (2008), Wheeling Walks [34]

Societal/40 years

United States adult population (25-64 yrs)

One-off 8-week community-wide intervention with mass media campaign

$20,099/QALY gained

Yes

NE

LOW

Cobiac (2009), Exercise, you only have to take it regularly not seriously [30]

Health sector perspective/Lifetime of the population in 2003

Australian population (25-60 yrs)

One-off 6-week mostly mass media campaign with some community support

Cost saving

-Cost Offsets (total): -$931 million (95% UI -$1176 to -$281)

-QALY gained (total): 23,000 (95% UI: 7600 to 40,000)

Yes

SE

LOW

De Smedt (2011), 10,000 Steps Ghent [31]

Public payer/20 years (cycle length of 1 year)

Population of a mid-sized city in Belgium (25-75 yrs)

Life-long pedometer-based community-wide intervention with mass media campaign, with a 5-year cycle where the pedometer was implemented in year one

Women: Cost-saving

-Cost offsets (average): -$386.61

-QALY gained (average): 0.11

Yes

SE

LOW

Men: Cost-saving

-Cost offsets (average): -$521.51

-QALY gained (average): 0.16

  

Goryakin (2019), Hypothetical campaign [32]

Health system / 31 years

Italy population (18+ yrs)

18 weeks duration with 6 segments in 31 years hypothetical mostly mass media campaign

$21,713/DALY

Yes

NE

VERY LOW

Mizdrak (2020), Hypothetical campaign [33]

Health system/ Lifetime of the population in 2011

New Zealand adult population (15-79 yrs)

One-off hypothetical mass media campaign to promote smartphone apps for physical activity

$130,740/QALY gained (95% UI 18,989 to 385,367)

No

NE

VERY LOW

  1. NE north-east quadrant, indicates that the intervention is more costly and more effective, SE south-east quadrant, indicates that the intervention is less costly and more effective, UI uncertainty interval
  2. aIn 2020 US Dollars
  3. bImplicit threshold values given by WHO team (see Additional file 1: Appendix 10 for more details and references). We only considered whether the point estimates fell within the threshold and did not consider uncertainty intervals as they were commonly missing
  4. cOverall judgement of certainty of each economic model for WHO decision-making according to a GRADE style rating (see Additional file 1: Appendix 13 for more details)