Table 3 Effects of high-intensity interval training on motivation for performing high intensity interval training over the next 6 months in men with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance after the ERASE trial
Variables | Mean | SD | Adjusted between-group differencea | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | 95% CI | p | d | |||
Beneficial | ||||||
HIIT (n = 25) | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 to 1.0 | 0.065 | 0.55 |
UC (n = 25) | 3.8 | 0.9 | ||||
Enjoyable | ||||||
HIIT (n = 25) | 3.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | −0.4 to 0.9 | 0.43 | 0.08 |
UC (n = 25) | 3.7 | 0.8 | ||||
Difficult | ||||||
HIIT (n = 25) | 2.2 | 1.0 | −0.3 | −0.8 to 0.3 | 0.32 | −0.40 |
UC (n = 25) | 2.6 | 1.0 | ||||
Controllable | ||||||
HIIT (n = 25) | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 to 1.3 | 0.006 | 0.68 |
UC (n = 25) | 3.6 | 0.9 | ||||
Confident | ||||||
HIIT (n = 25) | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | −0.2 to 1.0 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
UC (n = 25) | 3.8 | 1.0 | ||||
Motivated | ||||||
HIIT (n = 25) | 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | −0.1 to 1.1 | 0.11 | 0.30 |
UC (n = 25) | 3.8 | 0.9 | ||||
Supported | ||||||
HIIT (n = 25) | 4.1 | 1.2 | −0.1 | −0.6 to 0.7 | 0.87 | −0.12 |
UC (n = 25) | 4.3 | 0.8 | ||||
Specific Plan | ||||||
HIIT (n = 25)x | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 to 1.8 | 0.032 | 0.67 |
UC (n = 25) | 2.8 | 1.5 | ||||