Scale-up of the Internet-based Professional Learning to help teachers promote Activity in Youth (iPLAY) intervention: a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial

Table 4 Curricular and non-curricular intervention implementation fidelity

	Proportion implemented
Teacher implementation—Curricular components	12-months	24-months
150 min of PE/sport/week (teacher reported—median across modules)	59% teachers	59% teachers
Mean SAAFE rating > 3.0 rating (mentor-rated)^a	91% teachers	92% teachers
≥ 10 classroom energizers per week (mean of teacher reports)	48% teachers	48% teachers
1 weekly active homework activity (mean of teacher reports)	75% teachers	75% teachers
Teacher implementation as per protocol^b	57% teachers	59% teachers
Leader Implementation—Non-curricular components		24-months
Active playgrounds—Leader reports of implementing recommended strategies		53% schools
Sporting Schools funding used (principal report)		96% schools
At least one teacher complete accreditation to coach with a sporting body (teacher report)		9% schools
Parent newsletter distribution (Leader report)		41% schools
Parent info sessions (Leader report)		30% schools
One physically active school fundraiser (Leader report)		51% schools
Leader implementation as per protocol^c		55% schools

^aDuring observations, mentors rated teachers on the inclusion of the SAAFE principles within lessons
^bTeacher implemented ≥ 50% of curricular strategies
^cSchool implemented ≥ 50% of non-curricular strategies

ISSN: 1479-5868