Skip to main content

Table 3 AEBQ mean scores for all participants, by sex and by weight status

From: Eating behaviors, dietary patterns and weight status in emerging adulthood and longitudinal associations with eating behaviors in early childhood

AEBQ scales

 

Sex

Weight statusa

All

(n = 698)

Men

(n = 243)

Women

(n = 455)

 

Normal/

Underweight

(n = 389)

Overweight

(n = 188)

Obese

(n = 119)

 

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

P valueb

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

P valueb

Food approach

 Hunger

2.80 ± 0.72

2.67 ± 0.66

2.88 ± 0.75

< 0.001

2.83 ± 0.75

2.81 ± 0.69

2.70 ± 0.69

0.192

 Food responsiveness

3.26 ± 0.72

3.15 ± 0.70

3.32 ± 0.72

0.003

3.21 ± 0.70

3.34 ± 0.73

3.30 ± 0.76

0.104

 Emotional overeating

2.51 ± 0.96

2.34 ± 0.92

2.60 ± 0.97

0.001

2.29 ± 0.88c

2.67 ± 0.95d

2.98 ± 1.02e

< 0.001

 Enjoyment of food

4.33 ± 0.66

4.22 ± 0.67

4.38 ± 0.65

0.001

4.25 ± 0.71c

4.47 ± 0.56d

4.34 ± 0.61

0.003

Food avoidance

 Satiety responsiveness

2.69 ± 0.77

2.39 ± 0.65

2.85 ± 0.78

< 0.001

2.78 ± 0.82c

2.61 ± 0.69d

2.55 ± 0.70d

0.004

    Emotional undereating

2.95 ± 0.98

2.70 ± 0.97

3.08 ± 0.96

< 0.001

3.04 ± 1.02c

2.89 ± 0.93

2.77 ± 0.93d

0.020

    Food fussiness

2.02 ± 0.84

2.00 ± 0.83

2.03 ± 0.85

0.808

1.97 ± 0.84

2.03 ± 0.85

2.13 ± 0.82

0.081

    Slowness in eating

2.67 ± 1.00

2.35 ± 0.96

2.84 ± 0.98

< 0.001

2.79 ± 0.97c

2.49 ± 1.05d

2.55 ± 0.96d

0.001

  1. AEBQ Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire, BMI Body mass index
  2. a Based on World Health Organization classification of BMI: Underweight (BMI < 18.5), Normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9); Overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9); Obese (BMI ≥30.0). BMI was calculated as kg/m2 based on self-reported height and weight - corrected [30]. Few participants were classified as underweight (< 2% of the sample) and thus were grouped with the normal weight category. Missing values for weight status (n = 2)
  3. b P value from one-way ANOVA. For Enjoyment of food and Food fussiness, p value refers to Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Test because these variables were not normally distributed
  4. c-e For a given trait, different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) between two weight-status categories based on Tukey multiple comparisons of means