Open Access

Ethnic differences in BMI among Dutch adolescents: what is the role of screen-viewing, active commuting to school, and consumption of soft drinks and high-caloric snacks?

  • Amika S Singh1Email author,
  • Mai JM Chinapaw1,
  • Johannes Brug2,
  • Stef PJ Kremers3,
  • Tommy LS Visscher2, 4 and
  • Willem van Mechelen1
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity20096:23

DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-23

Received: 27 June 2008

Accepted: 21 April 2009

Published: 21 April 2009

The Erratum to this article has been published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2009 6:40

Abstract

Background

The threats posed by the rising prevalence of overweight and obesity on public health have been widely acknowledged. Several population groups, which deserve special attention because of their higher prevalence rates, have been identified. These include adolescents and ethnic sub-groups. The aim of the present study was twofold: (1) to assess ethnic differences in body mass index (BMI) and in behaviours that are related to both energy intake and energy expenditure, and (2) to examine whether these behaviours explain the relationship between ethnicity and BMI.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional data analysis among 957 Dutch adolescents (mean age = 12.7 years). Body height and weight were measured using a standardized protocol. Adolescents completed a questionnaire on screen-viewing behaviour, physical activity, consumption of sugar-containing beverages, and consumption of high-caloric snacks.

Results

In our study sample 121 adolescents (= 13%) were of Non-Western origin. BMI was significantly higher in Non-Western adolescents (boys: 19.9 kg/m2, SD = 3.0, girls: 20.9 kg/m2, SD = 3.8) compared to Dutch adolescents (boys: 18.4 kg/m2, SD = 2.8, girls: 19.0 kg/m2, SD = 3.0). Our results show that time spent on television viewing, active commuting to school, and consumption of fruit juices partially mediated the association between BMI and ethnicity.

Conclusion

Behaviours related to both energy expenditure and energy intake may contribute to the ethnic differences in BMI in adolescents and should be considered when tailoring overweight prevention programs to ethnic subpopulations.

Trial registration

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN87127361

Background

The threats that the rising prevalence of overweight and obesity pose on public health have been widely acknowledged [1]. Several high-risk groups have been identified with increased prevalence rates of overweight and obesity, among which adolescents [2] and ethnic subgroups [3, 4].

Onset of overweight during adolescence is particularly worrisome. Not only is it a strong predictor for increased risk of overweight in adulthood [5], but overweight status during adolescence is also associated with increased morbidity and mortality in later life [6]. Moreover, during adolescence health behaviours, among which energy balance-related behaviours (e.g. sedentary behaviour, physical activity, consumption of soft drinks and energy-dense snacks), are subject to important changes [7]. Unfavourable behavioural patterns established during this age period are vital in the development of adult health behaviours [8], and are therefore important for weight status in adulthood.

The burden of the obesity epidemic is not equally shared by all segments of the population. Several studies show that the prevalence of obesity is disproportionally high among ethnic subgroups and among people with lower socio-economic position, both in the adult population [9] and in youth [4, 1014]. Although socio-economic class and ethnicity are strongly correlated, it is established that the latter is independently associated with health [15]. The factors that govern this independent association may be related to cultural differences in underlying causes of excessive weight gain, overweight and obesity.

Although weight gain is influenced by many factors, it is clear that energy balance-related behaviours are playing a major role in the onset of overweight. Risk behaviours that are associated with excessive weight gain in adolescents are sedentary behaviour (especially screen-viewing behaviour), lack of physical activity, and consumption of high-caloric foods and beverages [16]. Population data suggest that ethnic disparities with regard to overweight are established during adolescence [13, 17]. It thus seems likely that these disparities reflect behavioural differences between ethnic groups that arise in the transition from childhood to adolescence [7]. Understanding how the different energy balance-related behaviours contribute to ethnic disparities in BMI in adolescents may enable us to target preventive intervention programs to specific subgroups. In the present cross-sectional study, we assessed ethnic differences in body mass index (BMI) and energy balance-related behaviours among a sample of adolescents attending prevocational secondary education in the Netherlands. Furthermore, we examined whether and which behaviours mediated the association between ethnicity and BMI.

Methods

Design and subjects

We conducted a cross-sectional data analysis, using baseline data collected in September 2003 from adolescents participating in a randomized controlled study, i.e. the Dutch Obesity Intervention in Teenagers (DOiT). Details on the aim, design and methods of DOiT have been published elsewhere [18]. All first year students of the 18 participating schools were invited for participation in DOiT; no inclusion criteria were set for students to participate. Written informed consent was obtained from all students and their parents. The Medical Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Center approved the study protocol.

Measures

Body composition

Trained research assistants performed anthropometric measurements, according to a standardized protocol. Body height was measured with an accuracy of 1 mm with a portable stadiometer (Seca 225). Body weight was measured and recorded within 0.1 kg with a calibrated electronic flat scale (Seca 888). Students were dressed in underwear during all measurements. We calculated body mass index (BMI) and used age and sex specific cut-off points to classify weight status according to the criteria of the International Obesity Task Force [19].

Questionnaire

General

Demographic and behavioural data were derived from a questionnaire that adolescents completed in the classroom. A teacher and/or member of the DOiT-team supervised the completion of the questionnaires.

Ethnicity

Data on ethnicity were collected by self-report according to a standard question on the country of birth of the parents ("Where was your mother/father born?"). According to Statistics Netherlands [20], an adolescent is considered to be of Dutch ethnicity if both parents were born in the Netherlands. An adolescent with at least one parent born in a foreign country is considered to be of foreign ethnicity. This definition, however, does not always cover the cultural differences that may importantly influence behaviour. Therefore we used an alternative definition [20], to differentiate between Dutch adolescents and adolescents from Non-Western origin. Pursuant to this definition, adolescents with at least one parent born in Turkey, Africa, Latin America or Asia were classified as Non-Western immigrants. Adolescents with at least one parent born outside the Netherlands, but inside Europe (including former Yugoslavia and Soviet Union), North America, Oceania, Indonesia or Japan were classified as 'Western immigrants' (n = 40). In the following we use the term 'ethnicity' with subdivisions 'Dutch' and 'Non-Western' to refer to the ethnic differences as defined above.

Behaviour

The following energy balance-related behaviours were addressed: (1) consumption of sugar-containing beverages (i.e. consumption of soft drinks and fruit juices [millilitres/day]), (2) consumption of high-caloric snacks (i.e. consumption of savoury snacks and sweet snacks [portions/day]), (3) screen-viewing behaviour (i.e. time spent on television viewing and computer use [minutes/day]), and (4) physical activity (i.e. active transport to school, participation in organized sports, and participation in unorganized sports [minutes/day]). Since there are no validated Dutch questionnaires addressing the behaviours selected for our study, we adapted other validated questionnaires on dietary intake [21, 22], screen-viewing behaviour [23], and physical activity [24] in adolescents. The structure of the questionnaire was equal for all behaviours. For a more detailed description of the questionnaire see appendix 1. The questionnaire was pre-tested for clarity and duration, among adolescents not participating in the study by means of cognitive interviewing [25].

Frequency and quantity were multiplied in order calculate daily consumption (separately for weekdays and weekend days). Weekday consumption (multiplied by 5) and weekend day consumption (multiplied by 2) were summed up and divided by 7 to calculate mean daily consumption. Since some subjects reported unrealistic values with regard to values above the 95th percentile were recoded as the value of the 95th percentile.

Statistical analyses

We calculated descriptive statistics for anthropometric measures, and assessed differences between Dutch and Non-Western adolescents in these variables (Kolmogorov; Smirnov Z), and in the prevalence of overweight/obesity (Pearson; Chi-Square). As most of the behavioural variables were skewed, we calculated means and medians, and the 25th and 75th percentiles for all behaviours. We examined differences between Dutch and Non-Western adolescents in energy balance-related behaviours with non-parametric Mann-Whitney Tests.

To test for mediation by sedentary behaviour, physical activity, consumption of soft drinks and energy-dense snacks we followed the principles outlined by Baron and Kenny [26]. Consistent with Baron and Kenny's conditions (see figures 1 and 2), a variable functions as a mediator when it meets the following four criteria: (1) the independent variable (ethnicity) must be associated with the outcome variable (BMI) (crude model); (2) the independent variable (ethnicity) must be associated with the mediator variables (energy balance-related behaviours); (3) the mediator variables (energy balance-related behaviours) must be associated with the outcome variable (BMI) after controlling for the independent variable (ethnicity) (adjusted models); and (4) the relationship between the independent variable (ethnicity) and the outcome variable (BMI) is significantly diminished when adjusting for the mediator variables (energy balance-related behaviours).
Figure 1

Mediated relationship (according to Baron and Kenny [26])

Figure 2

Energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) as a mediator variable of the relationship between BMI and ethnicity (Dutch versus Non-Western)

We calculated three (multiple) regression equations [27], with ethnicity as an independent dichotomous variable (Dutch = 0, Non-Western = 1). Furthermore, a Sobel Test [28] was conducted to assess if the relationship between ethnicity and BMI significantly decreased after energy balance-related behaviours were added to the regression model (criterion 4).

The signs and magnitudes of the regression coefficients indicate whether or not the third variable is a mediator or if it must be interpreted as a suppressor. If both regression coefficients share the same sign, a decreased adjusted association indicates (partial) mediation, while an increased adjusted association or an opposite sign indicates suppression/inconsistent mediation [29].

We report the unstandardized Beta statistics from linear regression that can be interpreted as the difference between Dutch and Non-Western adolescents.

Missing data (due to absence at the measurement day due to illness, doctor's visit, et cetera) on demographics, body composition, and energy balance-related behaviours were not imputed. In case data on weekend consumption (or activity) were not complete, weekday data were used to calculate the mean score for the daily score, and vice versa.

Significance levels were set at p ≤ .05. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 13.0.

Results

Participation and completion rate

A total of 18 schools, located throughout the Netherlands, participated in the study. Of 1323 invited adolescents, 1108 (84%) returned both the parental and student informed consent. Complete data from anthropometric measurements and questionnaires were obtained from 1014 (92%) adolescents. After exclusion of the group of Western immigrants, data of 957 (94%) adolescents were available for the present analyses.

Ethnic differences in body composition

In table 1 anthropometric data of our study sample are presented, stratified for gender and ethnicity. Mean age of the sample was 12.7 (SD = .5) years. Approximately 13% (N = 121) of all adolescents were of Non-Western origin. BMI and prevalence rates of obesity differed significantly between Dutch and Non-Western boys and girls, with significantly lower BMI and overweight/obesity prevalence rates in Dutch adolescents.
Table 1

Demographic and anthropometric variables in Dutch and Non-Western adolescents

 

boys

girls

Characteristics

Dutch

(n = 410)

Non-Western

(n = 64)

P Valuea

Dutch

(n = 426)

Non-Western

(n = 57)

P Value*

age, y

12.7 (.4)

13.0 (.7)

.039

12.6 (.5)

12.8 (.5)

.054

height, cm

159.3 (8.2)

157.9 (8.1)

.163

158.3 (7.3)

156.1 (7.7)

.182

weight, kg

47.0 (9.9)

49.9 (9.6)

.169

47.8 (9.5)

51.2 (12.0)

.066

BMI, kg/m2

18.4 (2.8)

19.9 (3.0)

.000

19.0 (3.0)

20.9 (3.9)

.003

overweight, No. (%)†

obese, No. (%)b

56 (13.7)

5 (1.2)

13 (20.3)

4 (6.3)

.007

64 (15.0)

11 (2.6)

14 (24.6)

6 (10.5)

.001

Data are presented as mean (SD) unless stated otherwise

* comparing Dutch and Non-Westerners, using the Kolmogorov Smirnov Test (all variables, except for %overweight/%obese), and the Pearson Chi-square (%overweight/% obese)

† using cut-off values described by Cole et al. [19]

Energy balance-related behaviours

In table 2 and 3 means and medians for all energy balance-related behaviours are shown. In the text below we present medians.
Table 2

Energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) in Dutch and Non-Western boys

  

Dutch

Non-Western

EBRBs

n

mean (std)

median

(25th – 75th percentile)

mean (std)

median

(25th – 75th percentile)

P Value*

Screen-viewing behaviour, min/day

television viewing

451

164 (96.8)

141 (94.3 – 212)

191 (108)

180 (86.8 – 267)

.074

computer use

433

123 (86.0)

98 (60.0 – 178)

141 (80.7)

129 (77.1 – 30.0)

.275

Physical activity, min/day

active transport to school

469

38.0 (29.6)

30.0 (14.0 – 60.0)

28.42 (24.9)

30.0 (10.0 – 30.0)

.006

organized sports

322

33.8 (19.6)

32.1 (18.6 – 42.9)

34.2 (20.3)

28.6 (21.4 – 49.3)

.275

unorganized sports

245

93.3 (111)

51.4 (25.7 – 111)

126 (1434)

164 (32.1 – 159)

.912

Consumption of sugar-containing drinks, ml/day

soft drinks

375

890 (710)

685 (347 – 1251)

1041 (780)

918 (153 – 1438)

.331

fruit juices

392

330 (391)

171 (28.6 – 468)

507 (499)

386 (10.2 – 788)

.025

High-caloric snack consumption, portions/day

savoury snacks

415

.59 (.51)

.43 (.29 – .86)

.66 (.54)

.43 (0.29 – 1.00)

.660

sweet snacks

427

1.58 (1.17)

1.00 (.71 – 2.00)

1.26 (.97)

.93 (.54 – 2.00)

.141

*comparing Dutch and Non-Western adolescents, using the Mann-Whitney Test

Table 3

Energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) in Dutch and Non-Western girls

  

Dutch

Non-Western

EBRBs

n

mean (std)

median

(25th – 75th percentile)

mean (std)

median

(25th – 75th percentile)

P Value*

Screen-viewing behaviour, min/day

television viewing

461

142 (86.4)

120 (77.1 – 180)

1867 (112)

161 (93.8 – 272)

.033

computer use

429

89 (67.6)

68.6 (34.29 – 120)

102 (71.2)

81.4 (60.0 – 137)

.529

Physical activity, min/day

active transport to school

480

36.8 (28.3)

30.0 (18.0 – 60.0)

27.3 (24.9)

20.0 (10.0 – 30.0)

480

organized sports

305

23.5 (16.4)

19.3 (10.7 – 30.0)

26.1 (18.6)

18.2 (11.8 – 37.5)

305

unorganized sports

204

53.4 (75.6)

34.3 (17.1 – 51.4)

75.4 (93.6)

34.3 (17.1 – 90.0)

204

Consumption of sugar-containing drinks, ml/day

soft drinks

395

774 (634)

657 (281 – 1142)

918 (700)

714 (439 – 1189)

395

fruit juices

396

326 (342)

200 (57.1 – 486)

476 (462)

323 (108 – 641)

396

High-caloric snack consumption, portions/day

savoury snacks

453

.58 (.51)

.43 (.14 – 86)

.77 (.59)

.57 (.29 – 1.00)

.044

sweet snacks

464

1.38 (.98)

1.00 (.57 – 2.00)

1.23 (1.10)

.86 (.43 – 2.00)

.094

*comparing Dutch and Non-Western adolescents, using the Mann-Whitney Test

Screen-viewing behaviour

Non-Western adolescents reported on average to watch more television than their Dutch peers. The difference of approximately 39 minutes per day between Dutch boys (141 minutes) and their Non-Western peers (180 minutes) was not statistically significant (p = .074). Non-Western girls reported on average 161 minutes per day of television viewing versus 120 minutes per day in Dutch girls (p = .033). Computer use was also higher in Non-Western adolescents. Differences in computer use between Dutch and Non-Western adolescents were not statistically significant.

Physical activity

Dutch adolescents reported on average more active commuting to school than their Non-Western peers. Differences were statistically significant both in boys (p = .037) and girls (p = .006). Differences between Dutch and Non-Western adolescents with regard to sports participation, both organized and unorganized, were not statistically significant.

Sugar-containing beverage consumption

Soft drink and fruit juice consumption was lower in Dutch than in Non-Western adolescents. Differences were not statistically significant.

High-caloric snack consumption

Both Dutch and Non-Western boys reported to consume on average 0.43 portions of savoury snacks and approximately 1.0 portions of sweet snacks per day. Non-Western girls reported to consume significantly more savoury snacks (.57 portions per day) than Dutch girls (.43 portions per day) (p = .005). Consumption of sweet snacks was higher among Dutch girls (1.00 portions per day versus .86 portions per day; p = .094).

Exclusion of Western immigrants from the analyses

Comparing energy balance-related behaviours of Dutch adolescents with Non-Western and Western immigrants showed no consistent pattern, i.e. Western immigrants resemble Dutch adolescents in some behaviours, in other behaviours they resemble Non-Western adolescents, and in some behaviours none of these two groups (table 4).
Table 4

Differences between Dutch, Non-Western immigrants, and Western immigrants with regard to energy balance-related behaviours. Data are presented as mean (SD)

 

Dutch

Non-Western immigrants

Western immigrants

boys

   

television viewing

164 (96.8)

191 (108)

222 (148)

computer use

123 (86.0)

141 (80.7)

115 (39.2)

soft drink consumption

890 (710)

1041 (780)

930 (972)

fruit juice consumption

330 (391.29)

507 (499)

451 (540)

active transport to school

38 (29.6)

28.4 (24.9)

26 (11.4)

savoury snack consumption

.59 (.51)

.66 (.54)

.69 (.68)

sweet snack consumption

1.58 (1.17)

1.26 (.97)

1.60 (1.46)

girls

   

television viewing

142 (86.4)

187 (112)

139 (52.9)

computer use

89.0 (67.6)

102 (71.2)

104 (104)

soft drink consumption

774 (634)

918 (700)

706 (800)

fruit juice consumption

326 (342)

476 (462)

290 (410)

active transport to school

36.8 (28.30)

27.3 (24.9)

35.3 (47.4)

savoury snack consumption

.58 (.51)

.77 (.59)

.71 (.25)

sweet snack consumption

1.38 (.98)

1.23 (1.10)

1.71 (.49)

Mediation analysis: relationship between ethnicity and BMI mediated by energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs)

Ethnicity was significantly associated with BMI, indicating that Non-Western boys and girls were more likely to have a higher BMI than Dutch adolescents (table 5, criterion 1). Non-Western boys and girls reported to watch more television, consume more fruit juices and savoury snacks (girls only), and spend less minutes on active commuting to school when compared to Dutch adolescents (table 5, criterion 2).
Table 5

Results of testing the mediational model: energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) as mediators of the relationship between ethnicity and BMI (criteria 1 and 2)

 

boys

girls

 

unstandardized regression coefficient (95% CI)

SE*

unstandardized regression coefficient (95% CI)

SE*

BMI: ethnicity (criterion 1)†

    

   BMI

1.54 (.80 – 2.28)

.37

1.86 (1.00 – 2.72)

.44

EBRBs: ethnicity (criterion 2)‡

    

screen-viewing behaviour

    

   television viewing

26.75 (.30 – 53.21)

13.46

44.28 (18.73 – 69.82)

13.00

   computer use

17.63 (-6.58 – 41.84)

12.32

13.14 (-6.88 – 33.16)

10.18

physical activity

    

   active transport to school

-9.60 (-17.27 – -1.93)

3.90

-9.46 (-17.26 – -1.66)

3.97

   organized sports

.41 (-6.52 – 7.33)

3.52

2.62 (-6.26 – 11.49)

4.51

   unorganised sports

32.52 (-6.69 – 71.73)

19.91

22.07 (-8.97 – 53.12)

15.75

sugar-containing beverage consumption

    

   soft drinks

151.03 (-73.48 – 375.54)

114.12

143.79 (-60.01 – 347.59)

103.66

   fruit juices

177.13 (54.22 – 300.05)

62.52

150.27 (38.07 – 262.47)

57.07

high-caloric snack consumption

    

   savoury snacks

.07 (-.08 – .22)

.08

.19 (.03 – .34)

.08

   sweet snacks

-.32 (-.65 – .01)

.17

-.15 (-.44 – .14)

.17

*SE = standard error

†regression model with BMI as criterion variable and ethnicity as predictor variable

‡regression model with EBRBs as criterion variable and ethnicity as predictor variable

Results of multiple regression models adjusted for EBRBs as well as the Sobel Test (table 6, criteria 3 and 4) showed that in boys the association between BMI and ethnicity was significantly mediated by television viewing, active transport to school, and consumption of fruit juices (figure 3). In girls, the association between BMI and ethnicity was significantly mediated by television viewing, active transport to school, consumption of fruit juices, and consumption of savoury snacks (figure 3). Adding all EBRBs that met all four criteria resulted in a significant decrease of the regression coefficient, both in boys and girls (figure 3).
Figure 3

Model depicting the associations between ethnicity (independent variable) and BMI (outcome variable), mediated by energy balance-related behaviours (mediator variables). Correlation coefficients are presented in parentheses for boys and girls, respectively

Table 6

Results of testing the mediational model: energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) as mediators of the relationship between ethnicity and BMI (criteria 3 and 4)

 

unstandardized regression coefficient (95% CI)

% mediation

SE*

Sobel

z-value

P value (Sobel)

boys

     

BMI: ethnicity and EBRBs (criteria 3 and 4)

     

television viewing

1.45 (.69 – 2.21)

5.8

.39

2.73

.006

active transport to school

1.49 (.75 – 2.23)

3.3

.38

2.81

.005

fruit juices consumption

1.29 (.43 – 2.16)

16.2

.44

2.35

.02

savoury snacks consumption

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BMI: ethnicity and all EBRBs

1. 16 (.28 – 2.05)

24.7

.45

2.15

.03

girls

     

BMI: ethnicity and EBRBs (criteria 3 and 4)

     

Television viewing

1.55 (.68 – 2.42)

16.7

.44

2.66

.008

active transport to school

1.75 (.87 – 2.62)

5.9

.44

2.86

.004

fruit juices consumption

2.22 (1.23 – 3.21)

S

.50

3.02

.003

savoury snacks consumption

1.75 (.89 – 2.61)

5.9

.44

2.86

.004

BMI: ethnicity and all EBRBs

1.39 (.42 – 2.37)

25.3

.50

2.28

.02

*SE = standard error

†regression model with BMI as the criterion variable and EBRBs and ethnicity as predictor variables

‡regression model with BMI as the criterion variable and television viewing, active transport to school, fruit juices, and savoury snacks (girls only)

NA = not applicable

S = suppression effect

Discussion

To our best knowledge, this is the first study exploring whether ethnic differences in objectively measured BMI can be explained by energy balance-related behaviours, taking into account both sides of the energy balance, using mediation analysis.

Our results show that Non-Western adolescents were more likely to have a higher BMI than Dutch adolescents, confirming results of other studies among European children and adolescents [4, 14, 3032]. Furthermore, we examined whether ethnic differences in energy balance-related behaviours partially explained the relationship between ethnicity and BMI and found that behaviours related to energy expenditure (television viewing and active transport behaviour) and energy intake (consumption of fruit juices and consumption of savoury snacks in girls) partly explained the ethnic disparities in BMI.

Our results suggest that differences in BMI between Dutch and Non-Western adolescents can partly be attributed to the larger amount of time Non-Western adolescents spend on television viewing. Our findings are consistent with previous cross-sectional studies, suggesting that time spent on television viewing is associated with a less favourable body composition [33, 34] and higher prevalence rates of obesity [35] in youth. Several longitudinal data provide evidence that time spent on television viewing predicts overweight and/or obesity in adulthood and television viewing during childhood and adolescence precedes overweight and/or obesity in adulthood [36, 37]. Andersen et al. [34] reported that Non-Hispanic black boys and girls had the highest rates of excessive television viewing (≥ 4 hours per day), but did not assess mediation effects of television viewing on the association between ethnicity and body composition. Previous evidence, derived from a sample of German children (aged 5–6 years), also indicates that television viewing is as an important determinant of ethnic differences in BMI [31].

Furthermore, our study findings indicate that differences with regard to commuting actively to school between Dutch and Non-Western adolescents partly explain the ethnic differences with regard to BMI in our study sample. Although the average difference per day was small (i.e. 9–10 minutes), such a small difference can have a significant impact on body composition over longer periods of time [38].

Declines in active commuting to school (i.e. the decrease in number of children actively commuting to school and the average distance travelled by bicycle and walking) and increases in overweight have both occurred at the same time [16, 39]. In line with our findings, results of a cross-sectional study among Dutch adolescents show that students who used their bicycle for transportation were more likely to be native Dutch [40]. However, there is still lack of experimental evidence to prove the causal link between declines of physical activity levels and the increasing prevalence of overweight, and a recent longitudinal study report suggests that excessive time spent in sedentary behaviour may be more important than (medium and high intensity) physical activity [37].

Fruit juice consumption partly explained the ethnic differences in BMI in boys. This is in line with two recent studies that found sweetened fruit juices to be dose-response associated with a higher risk of weight gain in adults [41] and overweight and obesity in schoolchildren [42]. In girls fruit juice consumption led to a significant increase of the regression coefficient (suppression). Since Non-Western girls reported to consume significantly more fruit juice than Dutch girls, we would have expected that adjusting the crude model for consumption of fruit juices would lead to a decrease of the regression coefficient. This finding may reflect ethnic differences with regard to the rationale behind fruit juice consumption. In Non-Western girls, unlike Dutch girls, consumption of fruit juices may indicate an overall healthier diet [43].

Our findings suggest that differences in BMI between Dutch and Non-Western girls can partly be attributed to the higher consumption of savoury snacks of Non-Western girls. Reviewing the literature [44] there is no clear association between energy intake or food composition and body composition in adolescents. However, in combination with high levels of TV viewing, a relationship between snacking and body composition was found [45]. Additional analyses revealed also a positive significant association between television viewing and consumption of savoury snacks among girls of our study sample (Pearson's r = .23, p = .000).

We were not able to fully explain ethnic differences in BMI by all energy balance-related behaviours. The unexplained remaining difference may be contributed to the interaction of biological and social factors with an environment that includes few opportunities for being physically active and an overabundance of other high-caloric foods or beverages [46].

Strength and limitations

A major strength of the present study is that we were able to analyze data of a relatively large study sample, with an equal gender distribution and a representative sub sample of Non-Western adolescents. Since misreporting of weight is very common, especially among overweight and obese adolescents [4749], the quality and consistency of our anthropometric data collection is also a strong element of our study. Another strength is that we have considered a large set of behaviours that have widely been associated with overweight and obesity in children and adolescents.

Some limitations of this study are worth noting when interpreting our results. Since we analyzed cross-sectional data, cause-effect relationships between energy balance-related behaviours and BMI cannot be assumed. Randomized controlled trials are needed to gain more insight in the nature of these relationships. Besides, the assessment of behavioural variables was based on self-report, a common drawback that we share with many other studies in the field. We adapted validated questionnaires to our study population and specific energy balance-related behaviours, but did not support assessment by any objective measurement. Objective behavioural measures however often are not feasible in large epidemiological studies. In consequence, we are not able to quantify the amount of over-reporting or under-reporting. When interpreting our results one must bear in mind that especially overweight adolescents are likely to underreport energy intake and overreport physical activity [16, 50].

Our study provides useful insights into the prevalence rates of overweight and obesity in Dutch and Non-Western adolescents and underlying behavioural determinants that may partly be responsible for ethnic disparities in BMI. Our findings indicate that behaviours related to both energy expenditure and energy intake may contribute to the ethnic differences in body composition that we found in our study population. Taking into account differences in energy balance-related behaviours in ethnic subpopulations help to improve targeted or tailored interventions for preventing overweight in adolescents. Therefore, interventions aimed at Non-Western subgroups should specifically focus on promoting active transport and discouraging television viewing.

Appendix 1

Questionnaire used to examine energy balance-related behaviour.

1. Questions on screen-viewing behaviour

How many days a week do you watch television/use the computer? Think about last week when answering the question. [Answering categories: none, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, every day]

How long on average did you watch television/use the computer on a usual (school/weekend)day? Think about a usual school day in the last week when answering the question. [Answering categories: open answer (hours and minutes/day)]

2. Questions on physical activity – active transport to school

How many days did you go to school by bicycle/on foot last week? [Answering categories: none, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days]

How many minutes does it usually take for you to bike/walk to school? Think about a usual school day in the last week when answering the question. [Answering categories: open answer (hours and minutes)]

3. Questions on consumption of sugar-containing beverages

How many days did you drink soft drinks/fruit juices last week? [Answering categories: none, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, every day]

On days that you drank soft drinks/fruit juices, how many glasses/bottles/cans did you drink (weekday/weekend day)? [Answering categories: open answers (glasses/day, bottles/day, cans/day)]

4. Questions on consumption of high-caloric snacks

How many days did you eat savoury snacks/sweets last week? [Answering categories: none, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, every day]

When you eat savoury snacks/sweets, how many portions do you usually eat? Think about last week when answering the question. [Answering categories: open answers (portions/day)]

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study is part of NHF-NRG and is funded by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (No: 2000Z003), the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sports, and the Royal Association of Teachers of Physical Education. None of the funders had input into protocol development, data collection, or analyses or interpretation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, EMGO-Institute
(2)
VU University Medical Center, EMGO-Institute
(3)
Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, Universiteit Maastricht
(4)
Vrije Universiteit, Institute for Health Sciences

References

  1. World Health Organization: Diet, nutrition, and prevention of chronic diseases, Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation, Geneva, 28 Jan – 1 Feb 2002. WHO technical report series 916. Geneva, Switzerland. 2003Google Scholar
  2. Dietz WH: Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994, 59: 955-959.Google Scholar
  3. Kumanyika S, Grier S: Targeting interventions for ethnic minority and low-income populations. Future Child. 2006, 16: 187-207. 10.1353/foc.2006.0005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Fredriks AM, van Buuren S, Hirasing RA, Wit JM, Verloove-Vanhorick SP: Alarming prevalences of overweight and obesity for children of Turkish, Moroccan and Dutch origin in The Netherlands according to international standards. Acta Paediatr. 2005, 94: 496-498.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R: Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev. 2004, 5 (Suppl 1): 4-85. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2004.00133.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH: The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. 1999, 282: 1523-1529. 10.1001/jama.282.16.1523.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kirk S, Scott BJ, Daniels SR: Pediatric obesity epidemic: treatment options. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005, 105: S44-S51. 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Leger LS, Nutbeam D: Research into health promoting schools. J Sch Health. 2000, 70: 257-259.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL: Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. JAMA. 1994, 272: 205-211. 10.1001/jama.272.3.205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Brussaard JH, Erp-Baart MA, Brants HA, Hulshof KF, Lowik MR: Nutrition and health among migrants in The Netherlands. Public Health Nutr. 2001, 4: 659-664. 10.1079/PHN2001149.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL: Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002, 288: 1728-1732. 10.1001/jama.288.14.1728.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Whitaker RC, Orzol SM: Obesity among US urban preschool children: relationships to race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006, 160: 578-584. 10.1001/archpedi.160.6.578.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS, Popkin BM: Ethnic differences in physical activity and inactivity patterns and overweight status. Obes Res. 2002, 10: 141-149. 10.1038/oby.2002.23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wardle J, Brodersen NH, Cole TJ, Jarvis MJ, Boniface DR: Development of adiposity in adolescence: five year longitudinal study of an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of young people in Britain. BMJ. 2006, 332: 1130-1135. 10.1136/bmj.38807.594792.AE.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wong MD, Shapiro MF, Boscardin WJ, Ettner SL: Contribution of major diseases to disparities in mortality. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 1585-1592. 10.1056/NEJMsa012979.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Rennie KL, Johnson L, Jebb SA: Behavioural determinants of obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 19: 343-358. 10.1016/j.beem.2005.04.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman E: The role of socioeconomic status gradients in explaining differences in US adolescents' health. Am J Public Health. 1999, 89: 1522-1528. 10.2105/AJPH.89.10.1522.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh AS, Chin A, Paw JM, Kremers SP, Visscher TL, Brug J, Van Mechelen W: Design of the Dutch Obesity Intervention in Teenagers (NRG-DOiT): Systematic development, implementation and evaluation of a school-based intervention aimed at the prevention of excessive weight gain in adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 304-10.1186/1471-2458-6-304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000, 320: 1240-1243. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Statistics Netherlands: Standaarddefinitie allochtonen. Hoe doet het CBS dat nou?. 2000, Voorburg, The Netherlands, 24-25.Google Scholar
  21. van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G, Steenhuis I, Oenema A: A short dutch questionnaire to measure fruit and vegetable intake: relative validity among adults and adolescents. Nutr Health. 2002, 16: 85-106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G, Steenhuis I: The relative validity of a short Dutch questionnaire as a means to categorize adults and adolescents to total and saturated fat intake. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2001, 14: 377-390. 10.1046/j.1365-277X.2001.00310.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson TN: Television viewing and childhood obesity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001, 48: 1017-1025. 10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70354-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Booth ML, Okely AD, Chey TN, Bauman A: The reliability and validity of the Adolescent Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002, 34: 1986-1995. 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. van der Horst K, Kremers S, Ferreira I, Singh A, Oenema A, Brug J: Perceived parenting style and practices and the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by adolescents. Health Educ Res. 2007, 22: 295-304. 10.1093/her/cyl080.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986, 51: 1173-1182. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmbeck GN: Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997, 65: 599-610. 10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V: A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002, 7: 83-104. 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM: Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect. Preventive Science. 2000, 1: 173-182. 10.1023/A:1026595011371.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Saxena S, Ambler G, Cole TJ, Majeed A: Ethnic group differences in overweight and obese children and young people in England: cross sectional survey. Arch Dis Child. 2004, 89: 30-36.Google Scholar
  31. Kuepper-Nybelen J, Lamerz A, Bruning N, Hebebrand J, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Brenner H: Major differences in prevalence of overweight according to nationality in preschool children living in Germany: determinants and public health implications. Arch Dis Child. 2005, 90: 359-363. 10.1136/adc.2004.052423.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar BN, Holmboe-Ottesen G, Lien N, Wandel M: Ethnic differences in body mass index and associated factors of adolescents from minorities in Oslo, Norway: a cross-sectional study. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7: 999-1008. 10.1079/PHN2004644.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Klein-Platat C, Oujaa M, Wagner A, Haan MC, Arveiler D, Schlienger JL, Simon C: Physical activity is inversely related to waist circumference in 12-y-old French adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2005, 29: 9-14. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802740.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Andersen RE, Crespo CJ, Bartlett SJ, Cheskin LJ, Pratt M: Relationship of physical activity and television watching with body weight and level of fatness among children: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 1998, 279: 938-942. 10.1001/jama.279.12.938.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Crespo CJ, Smit E, Troiano RP, Bartlett SJ, Macera CA, Andersen RE: Television watching, energy intake, and obesity in US children: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001, 155: 360-365.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hancox RJ, Milne BJ, Poulton R: Association between child and adolescent television viewing and adult health: a longitudinal birth cohort study. Lancet. 2004, 364: 257-262. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16675-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Boone JE, Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS, Popkin BM: Screen time and physical activity during adolescence: longitudinal effects on obesity in young adulthood. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007, 4: 26-10.1186/1479-5868-4-26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Seidell JC: The current epidemic of obesity. Physical Activity and Obesity. Edited by: Bouchard C. 2000, Champaign, Illinois: Human KineticsGoogle Scholar
  39. Salmon J, Timperio A, Cleland V, Venn A: Trends in children's physical activity and weight status in high and low socio-economic status areas of Melbourne, Victoria, 1985–2001. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005, 29: 337-342. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2005.tb00204.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. De Bruijn GJ, Kremers SP, Schaalma H, Van Mechelen W, Brug J: Determinants of adolescent bicycle use for transportation and snacking behavior. Prev Med. 2005, 40: 658-667. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Bes-Rastrollo M, Sanchez-Villegas A, Gomez-Gracia E, Martinez JA, Pajares RM, Martinez-Gonzalez MA: Predictors of weight gain in a Mediterranean cohort: the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83: 362-370.Google Scholar
  42. Sanigorski AM, Bell AC, Swinburn BA: Association of key foods and beverages with obesity in Australian schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10: 152-157. 10.1017/S1368980007246634.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A, Nillapun M, Jonwutiwes K, Bellisle F: Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Ann Behav Med. 2004, 27: 107-116. 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Rodriguez G, Moreno LA: Is dietary intake able to explain differences in body fatness in children and adolescents?. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006, 16: 294-301. 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.08.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Francis LA, Lee Y, Birch LL: Parental weight status and girls' television viewing, snacking, and body mass indexes. Obes Res. 2003, 11: 143-151. 10.1038/oby.2003.23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. French SA, Story M, Jeffery RW: Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001, 22: 309-335. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Jansen W, Looij-Jansen van de PM, Ferreira I, de Wilde EJ, Brug J: Differences in measured and self-reported height and weight in Dutch adolescents. Ann Nutr Metab. 2006, 50: 339-346. 10.1159/000094297.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Elgar FJ, Roberts C, Tudor-Smith C, Moore L: Validity of self-reported height and weight and predictors of bias in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2005, 37: 371-375. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.07.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Morrissey SL, Whetstone LM, Cummings DM, Owen LJ: Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight in eighth-grade students. J Sch Health. 2006, 76: 512-515. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00150.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Garaulet M, Martinez A, Victoria F, Perez-Llamas F, Ortega RM, Zamora S: Difference in dietary intake and activity level between normal-weight and overweight or obese adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000, 30: 253-258. 10.1097/00005176-200003000-00008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Singh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.