Skip to main content

Correction: Can the bias of self-reported sitting time be corrected? A statistical model validation study based on data from 23 993 adults in the Norwegian HUNT study

The Original Article was published on 27 November 2023

Correction: Kongsvold et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2023) 20:139

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01541-y.

Following the publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an incomplete note in Acknowledgement section. The note reads: “We would like to acknowledge all participants that contributed with device-measured sitting time and answered the surveys in the HUNT study.”

The complete Acknowledgement should have read “We would like to acknowledge all participants that contributed with device-measured sitting time and answered the surveys in the HUNT study. The Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) is a collaboration between HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU), Trøndelag County Council, Central Norway Regional Health Authority, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.”

The original article [1] has been updated.

References

  1. Kongsvold A, Flaaten M, Logacjov A, et al. Can the bias of self-reported sitting time be corrected? A statistical model validation study based on data from 23 993 adults in the Norwegian HUNT study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023;20:139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01541-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atle Kongsvold.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01541-y.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kongsvold, A., Flaaten, M., Logacjov, A. et al. Correction: Can the bias of self-reported sitting time be corrected? A statistical model validation study based on data from 23 993 adults in the Norwegian HUNT study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 20, 147 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01549-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01549-4