Table 3 Results of the stepwise linear regression analyses with backward elimination concerning walking for transport during leisure time
Walking for transport during leisure time | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | MODEL 3 | |||||||
Demographic characteristics | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p |
Age (yrs) | 0.013(0.025) | −0.036-0.062 | 0.600 | 0.009(0.025) | −0.040-0.058 | 0.724 | 0.002(0.025) | −0.047-0.051 | 0.950 |
Gender (ref: male) | −0.087(0.044) | −0.173-(−0.001) | 0.046 | −0.091(0.044) | −0.177-(−0.005) | 0.039 | −0.081(0.046) | −0.171-0.009 | 0.078 |
Parental employment | |||||||||
Both unemployed (ref) | |||||||||
One parent unemployed | −0.151(0.123) | −0.392-0.090 | 0.218 | −0.159(0.123) | −0.400-0.082 | 0.197 | −0.154(0.127) | −0.403-0.095 | 0.225 |
Both employed | −0.196(0.121) | −0.433-0.041 | 0.107 | −0.198(0.121) | −0.435-0.039 | 0.106 | −0.178(0.125) | −0.423-0.067 | 0.154 |
Educational attainment mother | |||||||||
Less than high school (ref) | |||||||||
Completed high school | −0.229(0.088) | −0.401-(−0.057) | 0.009 | −0.229(0.089) | −0.403-(−0.055) | 0.010 | −0.239(0.091) | −0.417-(−0.061) | 0.008 |
Completed college | −0.259(0.087) | −0.430-(−0.088) | 0.003 | −0.263(0.088) | −0.435-(−0.091) | 0.003 | −0.265(0.089) | −0.439-(−0.091) | 0.003 |
Completed University | −0.315(0.093) | −0.497-(−0.133) | <0.001 | −0.328(0.094) | −0.512-(−0.144) | <0.001 | −0.324(0.096) | −0.512-(−0.136) | <0.001 |
Educational attainment father | |||||||||
Less than high school (ref) | |||||||||
Completed high school | |||||||||
Completed college | |||||||||
Completed University | |||||||||
Psychosocial factors | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p |
Modeling | 0.019(0.031) | −0.042-0.080 | 0.538 | ||||||
Social norm | −0.006(0.023) | −0.051-0.039 | 0.780 | ||||||
Social support from family | −0.017(0.028) | −0.072-0.038 | 0.559 | ||||||
Social support from friends | 0.056(0.027) | 0.003-0.109 | 0.038 | ||||||
Self-efficacy internal | |||||||||
Self-efficacy external | −0.074(0.030) | −0.133-(−0.015) | 0.014 | ||||||
Perceived benefits | 0.025(0.041) | −0.055-0.105 | 0.510 | ||||||
Perceived barriers | −0.003(0.044) | −0.089-0.083 | 0.950 | ||||||
Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p |
Residential density | |||||||||
Land use mix diversity | |||||||||
Land use mix access | |||||||||
Connectivity | |||||||||
Walking infrastructure | |||||||||
Cycling infrastructure | |||||||||
Safety for cycling | |||||||||
Aesthetics | |||||||||
Safety for traffic | 0.099(0.048) | 0.005-0.193 | 0.040 | 0.116(0.051) | 0.016-0.216 | 0.023 | |||
Safety for crime | |||||||||
Convenience of recreation facilities | |||||||||