Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of normal and lognormal multilevel regression Models 1 - 6 investigating the effect of the food retail index on food intake and BMI adjusted for sex, age, household income and educational status as well as over- and underreporting (N = 384)

From: Clustering of unhealthy food around German schools and its influence on dietary behavior in school children: a pilot study

Dependent

variable

   Model 1

   BMI z-scorea

   Model 2

   Energy (kcal/day)

   Model 3

   Fat (g/day)

   Model 4

   Carb. (g/day)

   Model 5

   Junk Foodb

   Model 6

   Simple sugar foodsb

 

β

p-value

β

p-value

β

p-value

β

p-value

exp(β)

p-value

exp(β)

p-value

Food retail indexc

0.11

0.17

-12.15

0.60

-2.08

0.24

2.43

0.65

1.04

0.57

0.99

0.87

Age

0.08

0.37

71.08

0.01

3.13

0.10

9.46

0.049

1.04

0.63

0.91

0.29

Sex (ref: male)

0.22

0.06

-127.4

0.001

-3.30

0.21

-19.9

0.003

0.98

0.86

0.95

0.68

High income (ref: low)d

-0.32

0.02

-21.22

0.62

-2.72

0.35

7.40

0.31

0.99

0.93

1.15

0.06

High ISCED (ref: low)e

-0.36

0.006

-28.75

0.50

-1.18

0.69

1.30

0.86

0.84

0.09

1.08

0.35

  1. a:According to Cole et al. [33].
  2. b:Frequencies per week.
  3. c:Number of stores and restaurants per 1000 residents.
  4. d:Net household income in categories, low: below €2,250.
  5. e:Max. ISCED level of the parents, low: level 1 and 2 relates to lower secondary education and less.