| |
Homogenous landscape
|
Intensity (pay facilities)
|
Intensity (public facilities)
|
Connectivity (alpha)
|
|---|
|
Advantageous economic environment score quartile
|
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2
|
-0.29 (-0.63, 0.04)
|
0.46 (0.28, 0.64)*
|
0.20 (0.02, 0.37)*
|
-0.02 (-0.09, 0.05)
|
|
3
|
-0.50 (-0.86, -0.13)*
|
0.70 (0.46, 0.94)*
|
0.33 (0.11, 0.55)*
|
-0.01 (-0.10, 0.07)
|
|
4
|
-0.63 (-1.01, -0.25)*
|
0.90 (0.63, 1.18)*
|
0.40 (0.19, 0.61)*
|
-0.07 (-0.15, 0.00)
|
|
Disadvantageous social environment score quartile
|
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2
|
0.10 (-0.18, 0.37)
|
0.29 (0.17, 0.40)*
|
0.31 (0.20, 0.42)*
|
0.08 (0.02, 0.15)*
|
|
3
|
-0.20 (-0.46, 0.05)*
|
0.62 (0.37, 0.87)*
|
0.57 (0.41, 0.73)*
|
0.06 (0.00, 0.12)*
|
|
4
|
-0.27 (-0.66, 0.12)*
|
1.25 (0.94, 1.55)*
|
1.33 (1.00, 1.66)*
|
0.09 (0.01, 0.16)*
|
- 1National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, Wave I (1995-96), n = 18,294. Based on linear regression modeling each built environment factor from Table 3 (or street connectivity variable) as a function of quartiles of Advantageous economic and Disadvantageous social environment factor scores (Table 4).
- 2 Referent category is lowest quartile.
- *Statistically significant (p < 0.05)
