Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation coefficients among psychosocial scales for study 2.

From: Reliability and validity of brief psychosocial measures related to dietary behaviors

  Gender Fat pros Fat cons Fat S.E. Fiber pros Fiber cons Fiber S.E. F.V. pros F.V. cons F.V. S.E. H.E. strats H.E. ss H.E. env
Fat pros Men             
  Women             
Fat cons Men .10            
  Women .09            
Fat S.E. Men .11 -.27**           
  Women .24** -.37**           
Fiber pros Men .46** -.05 .29**          
  Women .53** -.01 .32**          
Fiber cons Men .10 .24** -.07 .10         
  Women .02 .36** -.20** .02         
Fiber S.E. Men .16* -.14* .46** .41** -.27**        
  Women .32** -.22** .64** .55** -.33**        
F.V. pros Men .51** .07 .22** .62** .04 .31**       
  Women .55** .04 .24** .65** .06 .39**       
F.V. cons Men .08 .39** -.15** .03 .45** -.23** .09      
  Women -.00 .49** -.34** -.01 .50** -.19** .07      
F.V. S.E. Men .14* -.14* .46** .34** -.18** .64** .30** -.24**     
  Women .24** -.27** .66** .38** -.22** .67** .37** -.33**     
H.E. strats Men .33** -.21** .34** .33** -.09 .33** .32** -.11 .32**    
  Women .29** -.16* .37** .35** -.24** .48** .29** -.18** .38**    
H.E. ss Men .33** -.07 .20** .22** -.09 .24** .37** -.10 .26** .53**   
  Women .30** -.09 .22** .23** -.13* .30** .31** -.12 .23** .55**   
H.E. env Men .10 -.05 .13* .11 -.20** .25** .14* -.18** .20** .19** .14*  
  Women .13 -.03 .12 .20** -.24** .27** .14* -.25** .24** .33** .24**  
H.E. enj Men .14* -.17** .17** .23** -.35** .44** .21** -.22** .34** .32** .19** .29**
  Women .24** -.20** .27** .41** -.32** .54** .29** -.23** .41** .44** .21** .27**
  1. Note. * p < .01; ** p < .001; S.E. = self-efficacy; F.V. = fruit and vegetables; H.E. = health eating; strats = strategies; ss = social support; env = environment; enj = enjoyment.