Skip to main content

Table 6 Correlations between TESQ-E subscales and general indicators of self-regulation (Study 4, n = 93)

From: Assessing self-regulation strategies: development and validation of the tempest self-regulation questionnaire for eating (TESQ-E) in adolescents

TESQ-E

Self-control

Delay of gratificationa

Short-term self-regulation

Long-term self-regulation

Autonomous motivation

Controlled motivation

Agentic autonomy

Self-presentational autonomy

 

r

p

r

p

r

p

r

p

r

p

r

p

r

p

r

p

Avoidance

.09

.41

.15

.15

.09

.42

.13

.22

.34

.001

.43

<.001

.27

.009

-.21

.047

Controlling temptations

.30

.004

.13

.22

.20

.06

.27

.01

.45

<.001

.39

<.001

.28

.008

-.12

.26

Distraction

.21

.047

-.01

.93

.11

.29

.29

.005

.43

<.001

.46

<.001

.34

.001

.02

.82

Suppression

.09

.42

.14

.19

-.04

.72

.07

.53

.53

<.001

.58

<.001

.34

.001

-.02

.84

Goal setting

.17

.10

.25

.02

.12

.26

.25

.02

.67

<.001

.53

<.001

.35

.001

-.02

.84

Goal deliberation

.18

.08

.21

.05

.02

.83

.16

.12

.58

<.001

.55

<.001

.35

.001

-.14

.19

Addressing temptations directly

.21

.04

.15

.16

.16

.13

.22

.03

.44

<.001

.46

<.001

.31

.003

-.19

.08

Addressing meaning temptation

.16

.13

.07

.54

.04

.74

.19

.07

.54

<.001

.58

<.001

.37

<.001

.000

.996

Addressing the goal directly

.19

.07

.24

.02

.07

.49

.22

.04

.67

<.001

.58

<.001

.38

<.001

-.09

.40

Self regulatory competence

.21

.048

.18

.09

.10

.36

.23

.03

.61

<.001

.60

<.001

.39

<.001

-.10

.34

  1. aBecause delay of gratification is a dichotomous measure, these correlations reflect Spearman’s rho. All other correlations are Pearson correlations.