Table 1 Results of logistic regression investigating the association between the number of food outlets and obesity in the three different environments after adjustment for covariates

2 km retail

Q1

REF

P

REF

P

REF

P

Q2

1.02 [0.89:1.16]

0.83

0.95 [0.83:1.08]

0.39

0.98 [0.83:1.17]

0.85

Q3

1.14 [0.99:1.31]

0.06

0.95 [0.83:1.07]

0.41

1.12 [0.94:0.33]

0.20

Q4

1.11 [0.95:1.30]

0.19

0.98 [0.85:1.13]

0.79

0.99 [0.82:1.21]

0.95

Range

0 - 167

2 - 89

0 - 93

2 km takeaways

Q1

REF

P

REF

P

REF

P

Q2

0.95 [0.83:1.08]

0.45

0.97 [0.85:1.10]

0.64

1.06 [0.89:1.25]

0.54

Q3

1.12 [0.98:1.28]

0.11

0.93 [0.83:1.05]

0.25

0.99 [0.84:1.18]

0.97

Q4

1.05 [0.90:0.22]

0.53

0.97 [0.84:1.13]

0.70

0.97 [0.80:1.16]

0.71

Range

0 – 165

3 – 95

0 - 88

2 km supermarkets

Q1

REF

P

REF

P

REF

P

Q2

0.96 [0.85:1.08]

0.47

1.03 [0.89:1.19]

0.68

0.85 [0.72:0.99]

0.04

Q3

0.97 [0.84:1.10]

0.58

1.02 [0.89:1.17]

0.80

0.79 [0.64:0.96]

0.02

Q4

1.03 [0.87:1.20]

0.68

1.00 [0.87:1.13]

0.99

1.02 [0.87:1.20]

0.80

Range

0 – 28

0 – 14

0 – 15

2 km total outlets

Q1

REF

P

REF

P

REF

P

Q2

1.04 [0.91:1.18]

0.60

0.95 [0.83:1.08]

0.42

1.02 [0.85:1.21]

0.87

Q3

1.11 [0.97:1.27]

0.15

0.92 [0.81:1.04]

0.17

1.07 [0.91:1.27]

0.41

Q4

1.11 [0.95:1.30]

0.18

1.00 [0.87:1.16]

0.95

1.00 [0.83:1.20]

0.99