Skip to main content

Table 3 Main intention to treat analyses of effect of Walk Well programme on primary and secondary outcomes assessed immediately after end of programme (12 weeks)

From: Effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial

 

Walk Well

Control

Main between group comparison

Outcomes

N

Mean (SD)

N

Mean (SD)

Intervention effect (95 % CI)a

p

ICC

Primary outcome

       

Step count per day

42

4823 (2059)

40

4784 (2613)

69.5 (−1054, 1193.3)

0.90

0.51

Secondary outcomes

       

Percentage time per day PA

42

33.5 (10.0)

40

34.0 (12.0)

- 1.5 (−6.1, 3.0)

0.5

0.22

Percentage time per day MVPA

42

3.0 (2.6)

40

3.1 (2.1)

0.3 (–0.7, 1.3)

0.55

0.42

Percentage time per day sedentary

42

66.4 (10.0)

40

65.9 (12.0)

1.6 (−3.0, 6.1)

0.49

0.22

Total MET minutes per week

37

1311.9 (1293.2)

37

1154.8 (1103.7)

56.0 (−428.8,540.9)

0.82

0.02

Body mass index

43

32.1 (7.7)

43

32.9 (7.5)

−0.21 (−0.83,0.41)

0.49

0.00

Waist circumference

45

104.9 (16.9)

42

107.8 (17.8)

−1.64 (−3.93,0.64)

0.15

0.00

Subjective vitality

39

14.6 (2.5)

35

14.3 (2.8)

0.33 (−0.85, 1.52)

0.57

0.00

Self-efficacy

43

14.4 (3.0)

42

13.7 (3.7)

0.77 (−0.68, 2.22)

0.29

0.08

EQ-5D

44

0.8 (0.27)

43

0.7 (0.30)

0.02 (−0.09, 0.14)

0.70

0.00

  1. SD standard deviation, ICC Intraclass correlation coefficient, SE-AID Self Efficacy and Intellectual Disabilities, EQ-5D European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions, MET metabolic equivalents, PA physical activity of any intensity, MVPA moderate vigorous physical activity
  2. aBetween group mixed effects model adjusted for cluster and baseline value