Skip to main content

Table 1 Odds Ratios of Cues (Within-Participants), Power of Food Scale Scores (Between-Participants) and Interactions Predicting Snacking (Reference Category = Random Prompts)

From: It’s the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life

  

Odds ratios (95 % CI) of internal and external cues (Covariates)

  

Negative affect

Arousal

Activities

Food available

Others eat

Company

Fixed effects

Intercept

0.25 (0.22,0.28)***

0.25 (0.22,0.28)***

0.24 (0.21,0.28)***

0.22 (0.19,0.25)***

0.23 (0.20,0.27)***

0.24 (0.22,0.27)***

 

PFS*Intercept

1.01 (1.00,1.02)***

1.01 (1.00,1.02)**

1.01 (1.00,1.02)**

1.02 (1.01,1.03)**

1.02 (1.01,1.03)**

1.01 (1.00,1.02)*

 

Slope Cue

1.11 (0.94,1.31)

1.03 (0.87,1.22)

0.52 (0.36,0.76)***

5.23 (3.45,7.95)***

4.06 (3.21,5.13)***

0.66 (0.50,0.88)**

 

PFS*Slope Cue

1.01 (1.00,1.02)*

1.01 (1.00,1.02)*

1.03 (1.00,1.06)*

0.99 (0.96,1.02)

0.97 (0.96,0.99)**

0.98 (0.97,1.00)

Random effects (Residual variances)

Intercept

0.08**

0.08**

0.07*

0.11**

0.10**

0.08**

 

Slope Cue

0.002

0.04

0.72**

0.63*

0.02

0.17

  1. Note. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001