From: Bike Score®: Associations between urban bikeability and cycling behavior in 24 cities
Intercept | Bike score coefficient | Adjusted R2 | |
---|---|---|---|
(10-unit change) | |||
β (95 % CI) | |||
Ann Arbor, Michigan | −3.3 | 0.9 (0.3–1.5) | 0.19 |
Austin, Texas | −2.5 | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | 0.30 |
Boston, Massachusetts | 0 | 0.2 (0.0–0.4) | 0.02 |
Calgary, Alberta | −0.5 | 0.2 (0.0–0.4) | 0.02 |
Chicago, Illinois | −1.6 | 0.4 (0.3–0.5) | 0.09 |
Eugene, Oregon | −0.5 | 1.4 (0.1–2.7) | 0.10 |
Fort Collins, Colorado | −21.8 | 3.5 (2.0–5.0) | 0.38 |
Halifax, Nova Scotia | −1 | 0.7 (−0.4−1.8) | 0.04 |
Madison, Wisconsin | −7.2 | 1.9 (1.4–2.4) | 0.55 |
Minneapolis, Minnesota | 0.9 | 0.4 (0.0–0.8) | 0.02 |
Moncton, New Brunswick | −0.8 | 0.2 (−0.1−0.5) | 0.13 |
Montréal, Québec | −7.7 | 1.6 (1.4–1.8) | 0.36 |
New York, New York | −0.6 | 0.2 (0.2–0.2) | 0.07 |
Portland, Oregon | −2.3 | 1.2 (0.8–1.6) | 0.20 |
San Francisco, California | −3.2 | 0.8 (0.5–1.1) | 0.15 |
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan | 0.5 | 0.2 (−0.5−0.9) | −0.01 |
Seattle, Washington | 1.4 | 0.3 (0.1–0.5) | 0.05 |
St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador | No fita | - | - |
Tempe, Arizona | −8.3 | 1.6 (0.6–2.6) | 0.19 |
Toronto, Ontario | −1.8 | 0.6 (0.4–0.8) | 0.06 |
Tucson, Arizona | −5 | 1.0 (0.7–1.3) | 0.24 |
Vancouver, British-Columbia | −2.1 | 0.8 (0.4–1.2) | 0.09 |
Victoria, British-Columbia | 19.9 | −1.1 (−2.2−0.0) | 0.15 |
Washington, DC | −1.4 | 0.6 (0.4–0.8) | 0.16 |