Skip to main content

Table 3 City-specific linear regression results for cycling mode share and Bike Score (5664 census tracts in 24 study cities)

From: Bike Score®: Associations between urban bikeability and cycling behavior in 24 cities

  Intercept Bike score coefficient Adjusted R2
(10-unit change)
β (95 % CI)
Ann Arbor, Michigan −3.3 0.9 (0.3–1.5) 0.19
Austin, Texas −2.5 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 0.30
Boston, Massachusetts 0 0.2 (0.0–0.4) 0.02
Calgary, Alberta −0.5 0.2 (0.0–0.4) 0.02
Chicago, Illinois −1.6 0.4 (0.3–0.5) 0.09
Eugene, Oregon −0.5 1.4 (0.1–2.7) 0.10
Fort Collins, Colorado −21.8 3.5 (2.0–5.0) 0.38
Halifax, Nova Scotia −1 0.7 (−0.4−1.8) 0.04
Madison, Wisconsin −7.2 1.9 (1.4–2.4) 0.55
Minneapolis, Minnesota 0.9 0.4 (0.0–0.8) 0.02
Moncton, New Brunswick −0.8 0.2 (−0.1−0.5) 0.13
Montréal, Québec −7.7 1.6 (1.4–1.8) 0.36
New York, New York −0.6 0.2 (0.2–0.2) 0.07
Portland, Oregon −2.3 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 0.20
San Francisco, California −3.2 0.8 (0.5–1.1) 0.15
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 0.5 0.2 (−0.5−0.9) −0.01
Seattle, Washington 1.4 0.3 (0.1–0.5) 0.05
St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador No fita - -
Tempe, Arizona −8.3 1.6 (0.6–2.6) 0.19
Toronto, Ontario −1.8 0.6 (0.4–0.8) 0.06
Tucson, Arizona −5 1.0 (0.7–1.3) 0.24
Vancouver, British-Columbia −2.1 0.8 (0.4–1.2) 0.09
Victoria, British-Columbia 19.9 −1.1 (−2.2−0.0) 0.15
Washington, DC −1.4 0.6 (0.4–0.8) 0.16
  1. Bold indicates coefficient is statistically significant at p < 0.05
  2. aCycling mode share was 0 % for all census tracts in St. John’s