Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics by study

From: Examining the impact of a province-wide physical education policy on secondary students’ physical activity as a natural experiment

Study 1: Survey data

Comparison (PEI) (n = 2258)

Intervention (Manitoba) (n = 33,619)

P value

Age (years), mean ± SD

15.8

0.71

15.7

0.82

<.0001*

 

n

%

n

%

 

Grade

 9

576

(25.5)

9070

(27.0)

0.0005

 10

591

(26.2)

9216

(27.4)

 

 11

543

(24.0)

8438

(25.1)

 

 12

548

(24.3)

6895

(20.5)

 

Sex

 Female

1053

(46.6)

16,846

(50.1)

<.0001

 Male

1094

(48.4)

16,773

(49.9)

 

 Missing

111

(4.9)

-

-

 

BMI status

 Healthy weight

1252

(55.4)

21,505

(64.0)

<.0001

 Overweight or obese

468

(20.7)

7107

(21.1)

 

 Missing

538

(23.8)

5007

(14.9)

 

Study 2: Accelerometer data

Comparison (Alberta) (n = 224)

Intervention (Manitoba) (n = 447)

P value

Age (years), mean ± SD

13.5

0.71

15.2

0.82

<.0001*

 

n

%

n

%

 

Sex

 Female

133

(59.4)

239

(54.0)

0.1828

 Male

91

(40.6)

204

(46.1)

 

BMI status

 Healthy weight

175

(78.1)

228

(51.0)

<.0001

 Overweight or obese

49

(21.9)

61

(13.7)

 

 Missing

-

-

158

(35.4)

 

School location

    

0.0181

 Urban

137

(61.2)

314

(70.3)

 

 Rural

87

(38.8)

133

(29.8)

 

School Socioeconomic status

    

<.0001

 High

186

(83.0)

139

(31.1)

 

 Low

38

(17.0)

308

(68.9)

 
  1. Note: For accelerometer data, missing categories that constitute less than 5% of the sample were omitted from the table. Therefore, counts may not add up to their respective totals
  2. *Student’s t-test was used to compare across study condition
  3. Chi-square test was used to compare across province