Skip to main content

Table 4 Structural Equation Model with Follow-up data with Calorie Intake and Leisure Time Physical Activity as mediators between Depression and Body Fat

From: Physical activity and calorie intake mediate the relationship from depression to body fat mass among female Mexican health workers

Explanatory variable

Coefficient ± Standar Error

P

Body Fat at follow-up equation, kg

 Leisure time physical activity at follow-up, METs/wk

−0.215 ± 0.091

0.019

 Calorie Intake at follow-up, 100 kcal

0.328 ± 0.142

0.021

 Age at follow-up

0.115 ± 0.036

0.001

 Height at follow-up

0.520 ± 0.092

< 0.001

 Constant

28.399 ± 0.425

< 0.001

Leisure time physical activity at follow-up equation, METs/wk

 Body fat at follow-up, kg

1.059 ± 0.456

0.020

 Depression score at follow-up, CES-D*

−0.191 ± 0.095

0.045

 Age at follow-up

−0.025 ± 0.071

0.722

 Constant

−30.038 ± 12.750

0.018

Calorie Intake at follow-up equation, 100 kcal

 Body fat at follow-up, kg

−0.341 ± 0.183

0.063

 Depression score at follow-up, CES-D*

0.188 ± 0.048

< 0.001

 Age at follow-up

−0.067 ± 0.035

0.057

 Constant

9.630 ± 5.285

0.068

Error Covariances

 Calorie intake with physical activity

−26.882 ± 20.302

0.185

  1. n = 456
  2. Fit statistics: χ 1=0.05, p = 0.830; RMSEA < 0.001, P(RMSEA < 0.05) =0.903; CFI = 1.0; TLI = 1.0
  3. The model satisfied stability with all eigenvalues inside the unit circle
  4. Model estimated with the asymptotic distribution free method. All covariance parameters between exogenous variables were also included (available as Additional file 1: Table S2). All variables were centered at the mean except body fat at follow-up
  5. *Excludes an item that asked about whether the subject experienced lack of hunger