Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in Physical Activity, Neighborhood Environment and Social Norms for Study Participants From Baseline to Follow-Up, By Distance from Neighborhood Investment

From: Results from a natural experiment: initial neighbourhood investments do not change objectively-assessed physical activity, psychological distress or perceptions of the neighbourhood

 

Intervention (Within .1 mile of Investment)

Comparison (Further than .1 mile from Investment)

Difference-in-Difference

Variables

Baseline Percent, Mean (SE)

(n = 119)

Change + Percent, Mean (SE)

(n = 119)

p-value

Baseline Percent, Mean(SE)

(n = 554)

Change + Percent, Mean (SE)

(n = 554)

p-value

Intervention Change – Comparison Change

(n = 673)

p-value

Health Outcomes

 Daily MVPA minutes for those participants who were physically functional

7.34 (2.32)

−2.18 (1.50)

0.148

6.55 (0.76)

−0.71 (0.80)

0.371

−1.47

0.318

 Self-reported average min/week walking place to place for those participants who were physically functional

139.0 (20.4)

−2.42 (26.53)

0.927

209.6 (14.7)

11.31 (18.71)

0.545

−13.74

0.738

 Body Mass Index (kg/m2)

32.13 (0.70)

−1.16 (0.35)

0.0008

30.75 (0.31)

−0.35 (0.15)

0.020

−0.81

0.032

 Obese (% with BMI > =30)

58.56

−1.99

0.563

48.60

−3.11

0.043

1.12

0.777

 Overweight (% BMI > =25)

78.89

−4.38

0.021

79.65

−2.45

0.059

−1.93

0.443

 Psychological Distress (K6)

4.83 (0.46)

−0.38 (0.38)

0.316

4.30 (0.19)

0.04(0.19)

0.850

−0.42

0.331

Neighborhood Environment

 Perceived Infrastructure (e.g. sidewalks, lighting, crosswalks, pedestrian signals) (5 point scale)

3.30 (0.06)

0.23 (0.06)

.0003

3.20 (0.03)

0.19 (0.03)

<.0001

0.04

0.564

 Aesthetics (e.g. trees, interesting things, attractive sights) (5 point scale)

2.97 (0.08)

0.35 (0.09)

<.0001

2.82 (0.04)

0.21 (0.04)

<.0001

0.15

0.123

 Safety (5 point scale)

2.83 (0.06)

0.13 (0.07)

0.043

2.90 (0.03)

0.18 (0.03)

<.0001

−0.05

0.523

 Satisfaction with one’s neighborhood as a place to live (% satisfied or very satisfied)

68.41

8.75

0.125

60.82

5.31

0.033

3.44

0.486

 Social Cohesion

3.11 (0.06)

0.07 (0.06)

0.251

3.05 (0.04)

0.17 (0.04)

<.0001

−0.09

0.198

 Many places in easy walking distance of home (% who agree or strongly agree)

46.23

33.76

<.0001

40.08

17.19

<.0001

16.57

0.005

 Traffic along nearby streets makes it difficult or unpleasant to walk (% who agree or strongly agree)

32.82

−4.75

0.363

29.30

−6.15

0.014

1.40

0.736

Social Norms and Environment

 How often do your friend and family participate in physical activity (PA)?

2.98 (0.11)

0.12 (0.14)

0.390

2.91 (0.05)

0.01 (0.07)

0.931

0.11

0.461

 How often do you see people in your neighborhood participating in PA?

3.18 (0.12)

0.23 (0.16)

0.150

3.21 (0.06)

0.01 (0.06)

0.869

0.22

0.20

 High intentions to engage in PA (% who intend)

56.33

−5.26

0.300

61.44

−6.43

0.016

1.17

0.819

 High barriers to PA (%)

18.76

−12.05

0.008

15.61

−9.18

<.0001

−2.87

0.716

 Self-efficacy to engage in PA

5.07 (0.22)

0.11 (0.24)

0.650

5.51 (0.10)

−0.00 (0.11)

0.996

0.11

0.677

 Outcome expectancies

3.95 (0.06)

−0.01 (0.07)

0.877

3.98 (0.03)

−0.04 (0.03)

0.189

0.03

0.644

  1. source: Authors’ calculations. Notes Results bolded in the table are significant after Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing adjustment at the 5% significance level; + Change is computed as difference between follow up and baseline; HD Hill District, HW Homewood, PA Physical Activity, NBHD Neighborhood. All models are covariate adjusted for sex, age, education, income, marital status, and any children, and include attrition weights