Skip to main content

Table 3 Bite rate, Success Ratio, and BMI at baseline, T21, and T31 of the three different intervention groups with p–values for Phase (T1, T2, or T3), Condition (NFC, VFC, or VFC+), and Phase*Condition*; for number of observations see the flowchart. Mean ± SD

From: Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial

 

NFC

VFC

VFC+

Phase

Condition

Phase x condition

p-value*

Bite Rate (bites/min):

 Baseline

6.4 ± 0.3a

6.2 ± 0.3a

5.9 ± 0.3a

   

 T2

5.6 ± 0.3b

4.4 ± 0.3b†

4.1 ± 0.4b†

   

 T3

6.2 ± 0.4b

4.9 ± 0.3b†

4.6 ± 0.4b†

.02

< .0001

< .01

Success ratio (%):

 Baseline

45.2 ± 2.9a

43.2 ± 2.7a

45.4 ± 3.0a

   

 T2

44.3 ± 3.0a

65.3 ± 2.8b†

68.2 ± 3.1b†

   

 T3

42.2 ± 3.2a

55.3 ± 3.0c†

57.5 ± 3.1c†

0.002

< .0001

< .0001

BMI (kg/m2):

 Baseline

31.7 ± 0.8a

31.1 ± 0.7a

31.6 ± 0.8a

   

 T2

31.9 ± 0.8a

30.6 ± 0.7b†

31.2 ± 0.8b†

   

 T3

31.3 ± 0.8a

30.3 ± 0.7c†

30.9 ± 0.8c†

< .0001

.64

.019

  1. 1 NFC no feedback condition, VFC vibrotactile feedback condition, VFC+ vibrotactile + visual feedback condition
  2. T1: baseline measurement before the intervention period; T2: follow-up measurement directly after the intervention period; T3: follow-up measurement eight weeks after the intervention period
  3. * p-values Mixed model ANOVA, fixed factors: phase of the study, condition, phase*condition, random factor: subject. Boldface: significant at at least p < .05
  4. Columns with different letters are significantly different (at least p < 0.05)
  5. Rows with different symbols are significantly different (at least p < 0.05)