Table 3 SROI application and findings
Ref. | SROI type | Purpose of the SROI study | Stakeholders included in the analysis | Study design | Use of a proxy database | Outcome groups included in the study | SROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluative | Evaluate the benefits generated by the services | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Post-intervention data collection + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | No | PR, OR, PuR | Not mentioned | |
Evaluative | Evaluate the social value created by the project, prove the wide impacts of the project and hope to secure continued funding | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Post-intervention data collection + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | No | PR, OR | 4:1 | |
Evaluative | Evaluate the benefits generated by the services | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Post-intervention data collection + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | No | PR, RR | Not mentioned | |
Evaluative | Identify and value the benefits delivered by the intervention | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Post-intervention data collection + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | No | PR, CR, SR, OR, PuR | 8:1 | |
Evaluative | Understand the impact of the program and identify key lessons to improve processes, approaches and future impact. | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Post-intervention data collection + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | Yes | PR, CR, OR | 7.5:1 | |
Evaluative | Missing | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Post-intervention data collection + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | Yes | PR, PuR, CR, RR, OR | 3:1 | |
Evaluative | Recognise and understand the social value created, identify improvements and potential areas of negative social value, inform stakeholders and account to funders. | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Before-and-after | No | PR, CR | 4.4:1 | |
Evaluative | Determine the social value of a typical community football club, specifically its social, health and community impact. | Beneficiaries, funders | Comparison group | Not mentioned | PR, CR, RR | 4.4:1 | |
Evaluative | Determine the impacts of the project, identify the most productive and inefficient parts, use the resources in the most efficient way, promote and extend the project. | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Post-intervention data collection + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | No | SR, PR | 12.5:1 | |
Evaluative | Demonstrate the impact on health, wellbeing and employability. Create systematic monitoring and measurement of outcome. Identify opportunities for learning, change and improvement. | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Multiple data collection during + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | Not mentioned | PR, CR | 4:1 | |
Evaluative | Enable policy makers to present a case for supporting investment in sport by demonstrating its wider contribution and value to society. | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Data analysis based on a systematic review of literature and consultation of academic experts in the field of health, crime, education and social capital | Yes | PR, CR | 1.9:1 | |
Evaluative | Examine whether the intervention is a cost effective one that should be rolled out across the country. | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Post-intervention data collection + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | Yes | PR, CR, PuR | 124:1 | |
Evaluative | Understand and evidence the broad value of developing high-quality coaches. | Beneficiaries | Post-intervention data collection + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | Yes | PR, CR, RR | 3:1 | |
Evaluative | Provide a result of the social return on investment (SROI) that MWAS created for stakeholders. | Beneficiaries, implementers, promoters, funders. | Opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | No | PR, CR, RR | 1.7:1 | |
Forecast and Evaluative | Understand and value the changes that occurred because of projects implemented with AT funding, and develop delivery and evaluation blueprint as a resource for the other organisations and similar programs. | Beneficiaries, implementers, funders, promoters | Before-and-after | Yes | PR, CR | 7.3:1 | |
Evaluative | Provide an economic and social impact assessment of the organisation. | Beneficiaries | Before-and-after | Yes | PR | 9:1 | |
Forecast and Evaluative | Evaluate a sport for development and peace intervention. | Beneficiaries, implementers | During-and-after + opinions and assumptions of the stakeholders | Yes | PR, RR | 1.7:1 |