Skip to main content

Table 2 Model fit indices for the latent growth curve models by parental clusters and gender

From: Longitudinal association between body mass index and physical activity among adolescents with different parental risk: a parallel latent growth curve modeling approach

 

Outcome: BMI

Outcome: PA

Parallel LGCM

χ2/df

RMSEA (90% CI)

CFI

TLI

χ2/df

RMSEA (90% CI)

CFI

TLI

χ2/df

RMSEA (90% CI)

CFI

TLI

Low risk

73.46/10

0.08 (0.07–0.10)

0.96

0.96

32.70/10

0.05 (0.03–0.07)

0.77

0.77

155.99/41

0.059 (0.050–0.07)

0.95

0.94

Haigh risk

28.07/10

0.05 (0.03–0.07)

0.95

0.95

34.85/10

0.06 (0.04–0.09)

0.60

0.60

87.51/41

0.04 (0.03–0.05)

0.95

0.94

Male

46.55/10

0.07 (0.05–0.09)

0.92

0.92

27.54/10

0.05 (0.03–0.07)

0.74

0.74

118.59/41

0.053 (0.04–0.06)

0.93

0.92

Female

37.52/10

0.05 (0.04–0.08)

0.97

0.97

11.76/10

0.01 (0.00–0.04)

0.96

0.96

90.79/41

0.03 (0.02–0.05)

0.97

0.97

All

28.07/10

0.05 (0.03–0.07)

0.95

0.95

34.27/10

0.044 (0.02–0.06)

0.80

0.81

135.48/41

0.041 (0.03–0.05)

0.96

0.95