Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of consumers and non-consumers of SSBs among Australian adults aged 18–30 years (n = 675)

From: Eating occasion situational factors and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in young adults

n (%)

Consumers

Non-consumers

P valuea

237 (35)

438 (65)

 

Age, mean (95% CI)

24.0 (23.5, 24.4)

24.4 (24.1, 24.7)

0.14

Sex, n (%)

  

0.44

 Male

59 (33)

121 (67)

 

 Female

178 (36)

317 (64)

 

Country of birth

  

0.015

 Australia

191 (38)

316 (62)

 

 Other

46 (27)

122 (73)

 

Education level, n (%)

  

0.042

 Lower than tertiary educationb

110 (40)

168 (60)

 

 Tertiary education or higher

127 (32)

270 (68)

 

Gross weekly household income, n (%)b

  

0.15

  < $120

45 (34)

89 (66)

 

 $120–499

85 (37)

144 (63)

 

 $500–599

53 (41)

75 (59)

 

  ≥ $1000

40 (29)

100 (71)

 

Main daily activity, n(%)

  

0.19

 Working full-time

67 (28)

137 (31)

 

 Working part-time

47 (20)

59 (13)

 

 Studying (full-time or part-time)

105 (44)

206 (47)

 

 Other

18 (8)

36 (8)

 

Living situation, n (%)

  

0.58

 With parents or family

82 (34)

143 (32)

 

 Alone

30 (13)

43 (10)

 

 With a partner or spouse

49 (21)

95 (22)

 

 With a flatmate or friend

67 (38)

145 (33)

 

 Otherc

9 (4)

12 (3)

 

Relationship status, n (%)

  

0.88

 Married or in a defacto relationship

53 (37)

91 (63)

 

 In a committed relationship or dating

77 (35)

144 (65)

 

 Not currently in a relationship

107 (35)

203 (65)

 

Smoking status

 Never smoker

193 (36)

350 (64)

0.63

 Former/current smoker

44 (33)

88 (67)

 

 BMI score, mean (95% CI)d

23.3 (22.7, 23.9)

22.5 (22.2, 22.8)

0.012

Weight status, n (%)e

  

0.027

 Healthy weight

169 (33)

348 (67)

 

 Overweight/obese

66 (42)

90 (58)

 
  1. aDifferences between consumers and non-consumers assessed using a t-test for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi2 test for categorical variables
  2. bIncludes n = 86 (13%) participants who had completed a technical and further education diploma or certificate and/or a trade/apprenticeship and n = 178 (64%) of participants who were currently studying
  3. cn = 631 with no missing data for income
  4. dIncludes responses “with children” (n = 17), university/college residence (n = 4)
  5. en = 673 with no missing data for BMI; results are geometric means (95% CI)